← administrative-performance-evaluation.pdf

Rebuilt HTML — PaddleOCR-VL (Baidu)

Content placed at each item's bbox to mirror the original PDF layout (font sizes are estimated). overlay · view JSON

Kentucky State University Administrative Performance Evaluation

Section I: Employee Information	Check One	Check One	☐ Probationary Review ☐ Annual Review
Employee Name	Department	Probationary 90-180 Day Review	☐ 90 ☐ 180 ☐ Other: ______
Employee ID #	Job Title	Evaluation Period
Section II: Employee Self-Assessment (To be completed by employee before meeting with supervisor)
Please complete the Employee Self-Assessment to evaluate your performance, accomplishments, and goals for the specified period by filling out the sections below.
1. How would you assess your effectiveness in leading your team or meeting departmental objectives? Provide examples of significant decisions you made and their outcomes.

2. Evaluate your communication skills and ability to foster collaboration within your team and across departments. What strategies have you used to improve teamwork and resolve conflicts?

3. What steps have you taken to enhance your skills and professional development? Are there specific areas where you feel additional training or resources would benefit your role?

4. What topics would you like to discuss with your supervisor during your evaluation?

5. Identify areas where you believe you could improve your performance or contribute more effectively. What support or resources would help you address these areas?

Full-Time

Probationary Review

Part-Time

Annual Review

Full-Time Part-Time_Department

Employee Name

180

undefined

Other

Full-Time Part-Time_Job Title

90 180 Other:_Evaluation Period

Employee ID #

1. How would you assess your effectiveness in leading your team or meeting departmental objectives? Provide examples of significant decisions you made and their outcomes._Row_1

2. Evaluate your communication skills and ability to foster collaboration within your team and across departments. What strategies have you used to improve teamwork and resolve conflicts?_Row_1

3. What steps have you taken to enhance your skills and professional development? Are there specific areas where you feel additional training or resources would benefit your role?_Row_1

4. What topics would you like discuss with your supervisor during your evaluation?_Row_1

5. Identify areas where you believe you could improve your performance or contribute more effectively. What support or resources would help you address these areas?_Row_1

Page 2 Download HTML

Kentucky State University Administrative Performance Evaluation

Section III: Supervisor's Performance Review

Please rate the KSU Employee on each performance factor based on performance of the employee for the evaluation period indicated in Section I. (Employee performance evaluations will not be used to determine merit pay increases) Ratings of excellent and needs improvement require a statement in the comment section explaining the rating.

Employee and supervisor have reviewed and discussed the employee's current assigned job description. ☐ Yes ☐ No

Employee and supervisor have reviewed and discussed the employee’s current assigned job description

Excellent:Employee performs job duties above and beyond work expectations, consistently exceeded performance goals and supervisor's expectations; anticipated and took additional duties beyond major responsibilities. Successful:Employee consistently performed job duties; work and behavior expectations consistently met; met performance goals and supervisor's expectations; completed and verified own work in a timely, accurate and thorough manner. Needs Improvement:Employee did not consistently and/or accurately perform job duties; work and/or behavior expectations were not met; did not meet performance goals and/or supervisor's expectations; not consistently reliable in handling daily duties; requires more supervision than expected.

CORE EXPECTATIONS

The evaluating supervisor will assess the employee according to their meeting the core expectations listed below. The evaluating supervisor must rate according to the evaluation rating provided above and provide comments where required.

CORE EXPECTATIONS	RATING	EVALUATING SUPERVISOR'S COMMENTS
Leadership and Decision-Making: Demonstrates strong leadership by setting clear goals, making informed decisions, and fostering a positive and productive work environment. Leads by example and inspires accountability within their teams.	☐ Excellent ☐ Successful ☐ Needs Improvement
Strategic Planning and Execution: Develops, implements, and evaluates strategies and processes that align with the KSU's mission and objectives. Effectively manages resources to meet deadlines and deliver results.	☐ Excellent ☐ Successful ☐ Needs Improvement
Communication and Collaboration: Exhibits excellent communication skills, ensuring clear, professional, and timely interactions with university faculty, staff, students, and community members. Encourages collaboration and works effectively across departments to achieve KSU goals.	☐ Excellent ☐ Successful ☐ Needs Improvement
Ethical and Professional Conduct: Upholds the highest standards of integrity, confidentiality, and professionalism. Ensures compliance with institutional policies and regulations while fostering an inclusive and respectful workplace.	☐ Excellent ☐ Successful ☐ Needs Improvement
Adaptability and Flexibility: Responds positively to changing circumstances, priorities, and needs within the university environment.	☐ Excellent ☐ Successful ☐ Needs Improvement