1776808126_Chicago-Waterman_Corridor_Study_Report_2025.05.08_online-artifacted.pdf — PaddleOCR-VL (Baidu)

		uparrow	uparrow	uparrow	downarrow	downarrow	downarrow	uparrow	uparrow	downarrow	downarrow	downarrow	downarrow
Movement	NBL	NBT	NBR	SBL	SBT	SBR	NEL	NET	NER	SWL	SWT	SWR
Lane Configurations		uparrowdownarrow			uparrowdownarrow			uparrowuparrow	uparrowuparrow		uparrowdownarrow
Traffic Volume (veh/h)	32	257	24	23	229	204	163	15	68	16	13	15
Future Volume (Veh/h)	32	257	24	23	229	204	163	15	68	16	13	15
Sign Control		Free			Free			Stop			Stop
Grade		0%			0%			0%			0%
Peak Hour Factor	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92	0.92
Hourly flow rate (vph)	35	279	26	25	249	222	177	16	74	17	14	16
Pedestrians								7
Lane Width (ft)								12.0
Walking Speed (ft/s)								3.5
Percent Blockage								1
Right turn flare (veh)									2
Median type		None			None
Median storage veh)
Upstream signal (ft)
pX, platoon unblocked
vC, conflicting volume	478			305			802	792	367	817	890	292
vC1, stage 1 conf vol
vC2, stage 2 conf vol
vCu, unblocked vol	478			305			802	792	367	817	890	292
tC, single (s)	4.1			4.1			7.1	6.5	6.2	7.1	6.5	6.2
tC, 2 stage (s)
tF (s)	2.2			2.2			3.5	4.0	3.3	3.5	4.0	3.3
p0 queue free %	97			98			34	95	89	93	95	98
cM capacity (veh/h)	1088			1267			268	305	678	243	268	752
Direction, Lane #	NB 1	SB 1	NE 1	SW 1
Volume Total	340	496	267	47
Volume Left	35	25	177	17
Volume Right	26	222	74	16
cSH	1088	1267	358	328
Volume to Capacity	0.03	0.02	0.75	0.14
Queue Length 95th (ft)	2	2	146	12
Control Delay (s)	1.2	0.6	39.4	17.8
Lane LOS	A	A	E	C
Approach Delay (s)	1.2	0.6	39.4	17.8
Approach LOS			E	C
Intersection Summary
Average Delay			10.5
Intersection Capacity Utilization			53.1%	ICU Level of Service					A
Analysis Period (min)			15