16, page 33. President Burse also said the university imposed additional disciplinary conditions "because his conduct was completely, totally unacceptable." Id. Dr. Stokes twice says President Burse gave her the information she "wanted to know." Id. at pages 33 and 34. When President Burse asked her, "Is there anything else that you need?", she did not say she needed anything else. Id. at page 34. Then when Dr. Shaw asked Dr. Stokes at the end of the meeting whether she was comfortable with starting her class on Monday, Dr. Stokes said, "Yeah, actually, yeah." Id., page 34.
Based on her own evidence, Dr. Stokes' claim in her Post-Hearing Argument that KSU “dismissed [the seriousness of] the threat of a student”6 is plainly false from the transcript quotes above and from Travis Haskins's email of October 12, 2015. Not only has the Petitioner sought to confuse the issues and divert attention from her own behavior, her own description of the “classroom safety incident” makes one wonder whether she exaggerated the danger posed by the student in the first place. Nevertheless, KSU responded appropriately and the so-called “classroom safety incident” was resolved.
Reviewing the transcript of the October 15, 2015, meeting, it is apparent that Dr. Stokes carefully avoided saying she was going to allow MS back into her class, although any reasonable person would have thought she had agreed to do so. This is another example of Dr. Stokes' resistant, uncooperative behavior.
During the October 15, 2015, meeting, Dr. Stokes said MS “has many reasons not to come back [to my class].... [H]e plagiarized 100% of the first essay and I sent that to his advisor who is Travis Haskins.” Dr. Stokes also acknowledged in the meeting that she knew her