9

Flores, D.M., Richardson, J.T., & Merlino, M.L. (2010). Examining the effects of the Daubert trilogy on expert evidence practices in federal civil court: An empirical analysis. Southern Illinois Law Journal, 34, 533-564.

Merlino, M.L., & Springer, V. (2009). Context and controversy: Why questions of validity and reliability are seldom resolved in an adversarial setting. Tulsa Law Review, 45, 133-145.

Domitrovich, S., & Merlino, M.L. (2009). Neuroscience and the Law: Cutting edge issues for twenty-first century judges as gatekeepers. The Judge's Journal (48), 19-22.

Merlino, M.L., Richardson, J.T., Chamberlain, J., & Springer, V. (2008). Science in the law school curriculum: A snapshot of the legal education landscape. Journal of Legal Education, 58, 190-213.

Merlino, M.L., Springer, V., Kelly, J.S., Hammond, D., Sahota, E., & Haines, L. (2008). Meeting the challenges of the Daubert trilogy: Refining and redefining the reliability of forensic evidence. Tulsa Law Review, 43(2), 417-445.

Merlino, M.L., Murray, C.I., & Richardson, J.T. (2008). Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 26(2), 187-206.

Dobbin, S.A., Gatowski, S.I., Eyre, R.N., Dahir, V.B., Merlino, M.L., & Richardson, J.T. (2007). Federal and state trial judges on the proffer and presentation of expert evidence. Justice System Journal, 28(1), 1-15.

Dahir, V.B., Richardson, J.T., Ginsburg, G.P., Gatowski, S.I., Dobbin, S.A., & Merlino, M.L. (2005). Judicial application of Daubert to psychological syndrome and profile evidence: A research note. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 11(1), 62-82.

Richardson, J.T., Ginsburg, G.P., Dobbin, S.A., Gatowski, S.I., Dahir, V.B., & Merlino, M. (2003). Judges and epidemiological evidence. Judicature, 87(1), 38-39.

Merlino, M.L., Dillehay, R.C., Dahir, V., & Maxwell, D. (2003). Science education for judges: What, where, and by whom? Judicature, 86(4), 210-213.

Dobbin, S.A., Gatowski, S.I., Richardson, J.T., Ginsburg, G.P., Merlino, M.L., & Dahir, V. (2002). Applying Daubert: How well do judges understand science and scientific method? Judicature, 85(5), 244-247.

Dobbin, S.A., Gatowski, S.I., Ginsburg, G.P., Merlino, M.L., Dahir, V., & Richardson, J.T. (2001). Surveying difficult populations: Lessons learned from a national survey of state trial court judges. Justice System Journal, 22(3), 287-307.

Gatowski, S.I., Dobbin, S.A., Richardson, J.T., Ginsburg, G.P., Merlino, M.L., & Dahir, V. (2001). Asking the gatekeepers: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world. Law and Human Behavior, 25(5), 433-458.

Davis, D., Follette, W.C., & Merlino, M.L. (1999). Seeds of rape: Female behavior is probative for females, definitive for males. Psychological Expertise and Criminal Justice: A Conference for