KENTUCKY STATE UNIVERSITY BOARD OF REGENTS ANNUAL EVALUATION OF THE PRESIDENT

Board of Regent's Name:___

Date of Review: ___

The Performance Evaluation links the University's Board of Regent's expectations of the President to actual performance. The principal objective of the evaluation is to assist in identifying the President's strengths and areas for improvement.

PERFORMANCE EVALUATION RATINGS

5-SA Strongly Agree - Clearly and consistently exceeded many requirements

4-A Agree - Clearly exceeded some, and met all other requirements

3-NS Not Sure - Clearly met all requirements, or balance minor need for improvement in one area with exceptional performance in another

2-D Disagree - Met some requirements, but clearly needs to improve in one or more areas to fully meet requirements I-SD Strongly Disagree - Clearly needs significant improvement in one or more areas to fully meet requirements

0-NA Not Applicable

PERFORMANCE FACTORS RATING COMMENTS/AREAS FOR IMPROVEMENT

STRATEGY AND PRIORITIES:

  1. The President has effectively worked with key constituents to identify the reality Kentucky State University currently faces.
  2. Strongly Agree
  3. Agree
  4. Not Sure
  5. Disagree
  6. Strongly Disagree
  7. Not Applicable

Total: ___

1