along with the plan to remedy.

Student advising is mentioned in the teaching section. Does this expectation align with the institution's current model of advising? KSU has implemented a 2+2 advising model where Juniors and Seniors are advised by faculty; this activity would be counted under Service in annual evaluations. Student career and curriculum advising is divided equally among unit faculty by discipline. Specific University Faculty Expectations Metrics of Service will be the default if discipline specific committees fail to meet the pre-stated deadline above.

Student and peer evaluations are used in the review of faculty. How so? Is there a metric to achieve? Is it evaluated in comparison to all other faculty members? Or, subject matter difficulty? (For example, General Chemistry is less likely to be viewed positively in comparison to General Psychology). Faculty will provide and analyze results of evaluation of their teaching, including student opinion of instruction. Faculty must achieve a rating of 3 or above from Students in each discipline. IDEA tool provided comparison metrics within unit, college, university, and professional discipline. This tool takes into account difficulty of the material by discipline.

Student advising is mentioned in the teaching section. Does this expectation align with the institution's current model of advising? KSU has implemented a 2+2 advising model where Juniors and Seniors are advised by faculty; this activity would be counted under Service in annual evaluations.