Instructions: For the items below rate the faculty member from 1 to 4 according to the Item Rating Scale given to the right. All items in the Teaching Category must be evaluated. For each of the teaching roles A and B, an average will be computed. Please write these averages in the “Averages Column” for each respective teaching role. Item Ratings Outstanding = 4 Above Satisfactory = 3 Satisfactory = 2 Need Improvement = 1 Unsatisfactory = 0 Averages Column
Instructional Design The extent to which the faculty member:
Syllabi follow guidelines identified by University Guidelines.
Assignments, projects, and exams are related to the outcome(s) identified for the course.
Instructional activities are clearly related to the outcome(s) identified for the course.
Course materials, including textbook, are clearly related to course outcome(s).
Instructional materials are appropriate for the target student population.
Uses “up-to-date” course materials.
Prepares assignments, handouts, exams, and activities to promote student interest and enhance learning.
Total successful credit hour production (grades > F) is greater than or equal to 2/3 faculty base salary and verified with student competencies per syllabus stated assessment reports.
Instructional Design Rating
Content Expertise The extent to which the faculty member:
Demonstrates knowledge of discipline.
Demonstrates competence with course content that is relevant and thorough.
Instructional technology use is clearly related to the outcome(s) identified for the course.
Instructional technology use promotes mastery of concept(s) or content of the course.
Content Expertise Rating
1