College and University-level Administrators

■ Schools

Tenured Faculty

Tenure-Track Faculty

Term

■ Provost

The review process at each administrative level shall include appropriate evaluations of performance in teaching, scholarship, and service. The evaluation shall be a part of the individual's evaluation file housed in the Office of Academic Affairs and Human Resources, with a copy to the faculty member, Chair, and Dean.

The review process at each level shall be limited to professionally relevant considerations and shall include documented evidence of performance from the faculty member, students, other faculty, and College- and University-level administrators. The documented evidence shall be a part of the individual's evaluation dossier.

Faculty shall be evaluated on their teaching, research, and service performance for the Fall 2022 term using established discipline guidelines. This HB 250 mandate stipulates a review process that will include all tenured, tenure-track, and term faculty.

In reviewing all three areas of faculty performance (quality of teaching effectiveness, quality of professional growth and scholarly achievement, and quality of service and community contribution), faculty appointments that are reassigned to the administration, library, research or extension will be evaluated according to their annual contracts and distribution of effort agreements. Faculty may include scholarly achievements from Fall 2020 to Fall 2022 in the professional growth and scholarly achievement category only.

Academic discipline areas may articulate expectations that go beyond the minimums to meet professional accrediting and/or certification criteria. If these are in addition to the published benchmarks in the Faculty Handbook (2019), the additional measures would also need to be presented to the Dean and Provost for approval.