Table 4-4: Generic Guidelines for the assessment of magnitude

MagnitudeGuidelines
HighTotal loss or major alteration to key elements/features of the baseline conditions such that post development character/composition of baseline conditions will be fundamentally changed.
MediumLoss or alteration to one or more key elements/features of the baseline conditions such that post development character/composition of the baseline conditions will be materially changed.
LowMinor shift away from baseline conditions. Changes arising from the alteration will be detectable but not material; the underlying character/composition of the baseline conditions will be similar to the pre-development situation.
NegligibleVery little change from baseline conditions. Change is barely distinguishable, approximating to a “no change” situation.

iii. Assessment of Significance of Effects

4.6.8 The approach to the assessment of significance is outlined in Table 4-5. A combination of the magnitude of the effect under consideration and the sensitivity of the receiving environment determines the significance of effect.

4.6.9 It should be noted that this general approach is a framework and should not be treated as a matrix. In each specialist chapter of the PEIR, significance of effects will be explained with reference to that particular discipline.

Table 4-5: Classification of effects

Value and sensitivity of receptor

Magnitude Very High High Medium Low Negligible

High Major Major Moderate Moderate Minor

Medium Major Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible

Low Moderate Moderate Minor Negligible Negligible

Negligible Minor Minor Negligible Negligible Negligible

4.6.10 The significance of the effects arising from the Project will be reported using a seven-point scale, as follows:

  • Major Adverse;
  • Moderate Adverse;
  • Minor Adverse;
  • Negligible;
  • Minor Beneficial;
  • Moderate Beneficial; and
  • Major Beneficial.