OHRP provides guidance regarding the reporting of unanticipated problems or adverse events, including the following clarifications.
Unanticipated problems include any incident, experience, or outcome that meets all of the following criteria:
OHRP recognizes that it may be difficult to determine whether a particular incident, experience, or outcome is unexpected and whether it is related or possibly related to participation in the research. OHRP notes that an incident, experience, or outcome that meets the three criteria above generally will warrant consideration of substantive changes in the research protocol or informed consent process/document or other corrective actions in order to protect the safety, welfare, or rights of subjects or others.
Any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a human subject, including any abnormal sign (for example, abnormal physical exam or laboratory finding), symptom, or disease, temporally associated with the subject's participation in the research, whether or not considered related to the subject's participation in the research (modified from the definition of adverse events in the 1996 International Conference on Harmonization E-6 Guidelines for Good Clinical Practice).
Adverse events encompass both physical and psychological harms. They occur most commonly in the context of biomedical research, although on occasion, they can occur in the context of social and behavioral research.
The key question regarding a particular adverse event is whether it meets the three criteria described outlined above and therefore represents an unanticipated problem. To determine whether an adverse event is an unanticipated problem, the following questions should be asked: Is the adverse event unexpected? Is the adverse event related or possibly related to participation in the research? Does the adverse event suggest that the research places subjects or others at a greater risk of harm than was previously known