COMPREHENSIVE FACULTY EVALUATION SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE TABULATION: RATIONALE FOR RATINGS

Form L-AT-2

Faculty Member:

Date:

Administrator: _____ Division/Unit: _____

Division/Unit:

The following rationale is offered to justify the ratings of Does Not Meet Expectations and Exceeds Expectations in the categories indicated. This form must accompany the Administrative Tabulation, Form AT-1. (Additional paper or clearly marked substitute form may be used.)

1. Professional Competence. Please indicate the benchmarks that had been set for this category and describe how the faculty member either failed to meet expectations or exceeded expectations. Documentary evidence may be required.
2. Rating: D M E
2. Professional and Creative Activity. Please indicate the benchmarks that had been set for this category and describe how the faculty member either failed to meet expectations or exceeded expectations. Documentary evidence may be required.
3. Rating: D M E
3. Service. Please indicate the benchmarks that had been set for this category and describe how the faculty member either failed to meet expectations or exceeded expectations. Documentary evidence may be required.

Rating: D M E

These rationales have been discussed and accepted by:

Signed:_____ Administrator

<div style="text-align: center;"><img src="imgs/img_in_image_box_0_0_731_20.jpg" alt="Image" width="100%" /></div> <div style="text-align: center;"><img src="imgs/img_in_image_box_21_11_708_54.jpg" alt="Image" width="93%" /></div>

Faculty Member

5-63