COMPREHENSIVE FACULTY EVALUATION SYSTEM
ADMINISTRATOR REVIEW FORM
Faculty Member: _____
Date: _____
Division/Unit: Library
This review is based on the administrator's examination of the faculty member's achievements as presented in the curriculum vitae, success with respect to the Professional Development Plan/Distribution of Effort Agreement, as recorded on form PDP/DEA-1, prepared for the previous year, and observations of teaching (when appropriate). For each of the three evaluated areas below, any rating of "does not meet expectations" or "exceeds expectations" must be accompanied with clear and specific rationale. The administrator is required to make reference to specific items in the curriculum vitae or in the Professional Development Plan/Distribution of Effort Agreement, as recorded on form PDP/DEA-1 that support any rating other than "meets expectations." These rationales will be reported on Form AT-2 after a conference with the Faculty Member.
This review includes observation: Yes No
Professional Competence:
nmary for Professional Competence:
Overall, this faculty member:
Does Not Meet Expectations
Meets Expectations
Exceeds Expectations
Library Duties:
Planning and Preparation:
Advising:
Continuing Growth: Exceeds Expectations
Note: For Categories 2 and 3, a Faculty Member is not expected to have ratings in each sub-category. It is possible and acceptable to receive a rating of “exceeds expectations” in only one sub-category and then also receive an overall rating of “exceeds expectations” for the entire category. Mark only the areas that apply.
Professional/Creative Activity:
Summary for Professional Activity:
Overall, this faculty member:
Does Not Meet Expectations
Meets Expectations
Exceeds Expectations
Publication:
Does Not Meet Expectations
Research:
Performance:
Development:
Other (Specified in PDP):
Service:
rvice: Summary for Service:
University:
Unit:
Community:
Other (Specified in PDP):
Note: The Administrator's rationale for any ratings of “Does not meet expectations” or “Exceeds expectations” will be included in the Administrative Tabulation: Rationale for Ratings, Form AT-2.
5-60