COMPREHENSIVE FACULTY EVALUATION SYSTEM

Form L-PR-2

PEER REVIEW'S RATIONALE FOR RATINGS

Peer Reviewer Number: ___

Date: _____

Faculty Member: ___

Division/Unit: Library

The following rationale is offered to justify the ratings of Does Not Meet Expectations and Exceeds Expectations in the categories indicated. This form must accompany the Peer Review Form, Form PR-1. (Additional paper or substitute form may be used.)

1. Professional Competence. Please indicate the benchmarks that had been set for this category and describe how the faculty member either failed to meet expectations or exceeded expectations. Documentary evidence may be required.
2. Rating: D M E
2. Professional and Creative Activity. Please indicate the benchmarks that had been set for this category and describe how the faculty member either failed to meet expectations or exceeded expectations. Documentary evidence may be required.
3. Rating: D M E
3. Service. Please indicate the benchmarks that had been set for this category and describe how the faculty member either failed to meet expectations or exceeded expectations. Documentary evidence may be required.

Rating: D M E

5-59