COMPREHENSIVE FACULTY EVALUATION SYSTEM
PEER REVIEW FORM
Peer Reviewer Number: ___
Faculty Member: ___
Date:
Division/Unit: Library
This review is based on the reviewer's examination of the faculty member's achievements as presented in the curriculum vitae, success with respect to the Professional Development Plan/Distribution of Effort Agreement, as recorded on form PDP/DEA-1, prepared for the previous year, and observations of teaching (when appropriate). For each of the three evaluated areas below, any rating of "does not meet expectations" or "exceeds expectations" must be accompanied with clear and specific rationale. The reviewer is required to make reference to specific items in the curriculum vitae or in the Professional Development Plan/Distribution of Effort Agreement, as recorded on form PDP/DEA-1 that support any rating other than "meets expectations."
This review includes observation: Yes No
RATING CATEGORIES Exceeds ExpectationsÄÄÄ-ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ Meets ExpectationsÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ Does Not Meet ExpectationsÄ-- i
Summary for Professional Competence: Overall, this faculty member: Does Not Meet Expectations Meets Expectations Exceeds Expectations
Note: For Categories 2 and 3, a Faculty Member is not expected to have ratings in each sub-category. It is possible and acceptable to receive a rating of “exceeds expectations” in only one sub-category and then also receive an overall rating of “exceeds expectations” for the entire category. Mark only the areas that apply.
Please attach Form PR-2, the Peer Reviewer's Rationale for Ratings, to offer rationale and reference to documentation for any ratings of “Does not meet expectations” or “Exceeds expectations.”
5-58