COMPREHENSIVE FACULTY EVALUATION SYSTEM
ADMINISTRATOR REVIEW FORM
Faculty Member: _____
Date: ___
Division/Unit: ___
This review is based on the administrator's examination of the faculty member's achievements as presented in the curriculum vitae, success with respect to the Professional Development Plan prepared/Distribution of Effort Agreement for the previous year, and observations of teaching (when appropriate). For each of the three evaluated areas below, any rating of "does not meet expectations" or "exceeds expectations" must be accompanied with clear and specific rationale. The administrator is required to make reference to specific items in the curriculum vitae or in the Professional Development Plan/Distribution of Effort Agreement that support any rating other than "meets expectations" These rationale will be reported on Form AT-2 after a conference with the Faculty Member.
This review includes a classroom observation: Yes No
Summary for Teaching:
Teaching:
Instruction:
Planning and Preparation:
Advising:
Continuing Growth:
Continuing Growth: Exceeds Expectations
Note: For Categories 2 and 3, a Faculty Member is not expected to have ratings in each sub-category. It is possible and acceptable to receive a rating of “exceeds expectations” in only one sub-category and then also receive an overall rating of “exceeds expectations” for the entire category. Mark only the areas that apply.
Professional/Creative Activity:
Publication:
Research:
Performance:
Development:
Other (Specified in PDP/DEA-1):
Service:
University:
Unit:
Community:
Other (Specified in PDP/DEA-1):
Note: The Administrator's rationale for any ratings of “Does not meet expectations” or “Exceeds expectations” will be included in the Administrative Tabulation: Rationale for Ratings, Form AT-2.
5-54