COMPREHENSIVE FACULTY EVALUATION SYSTEM
Form PR-1
PEER REVIEW FORM
Peer Reviewer Number: ___
Faculty Member: ___ Date: ___
Division/Unit: ___
This review is based on the reviewer's examination of the faculty member's achievements as presented in the curriculum vitae, success with respect to the Professional Development Plan/Distribution of Effort Agreement prepared for the previous year, and observations of teaching (when appropriate). For each of the three evaluated areas below, any rating of "does not meet expectations" or "exceeds expectations" must be accompanied with clear and specific rationale. The reviewer is required to make reference to specific items in the curriculum vitae or in the Professional Development Plan/Distribution of Effort Agreement that support any rating other than "meets expectations."
This review includes a classroom observation: Yes No
RATING CATEGORIES
Exceeds ExpectationsÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ Meets ExpectationsÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ Does Not Meet ExpectationsÄ:
Does Not Meet Expectations extsuperscript{A}
Summary for Teaching:
1. Teaching:
Instruction: Overall, this faculty member:
Planning and Preparation: Does Not Meet Expectations
Advising: Meets Expectations
Continuing Growth: Exceeds Expectations
Note: For Categories 2 and 3, a Faculty Member is not expected to have ratings in each sub-category. It is possible and acceptable to receive a rating of “exceeds expectations” in only one sub-category and then also receive an overall rating of “exceeds expectations” for the entire category. Mark only the areas that apply.
Professional/Creative Activity: Summary for Professional Activity:
Publication:
Research:
Performance:
Development:
Other (Specified in PDP/DEA-1):
Other (Specified in PDP/DEA-1):
3. Service:
Service:
University:
Unit:
Community:
Other (Specified in PDP):
Please attach Form PR-2, the Peer Reviewer's Rationale for Ratings, to offer rationale and reference to documentation for any ratings of “Does not meet expectations” or “Exceeds expectations.”
5-52