ABOUT ACADEMIC PROGRAM REVIEW
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Kentucky has a long history of program duplication
A PROCESS TO REVIEW ACADEMIC PROGRAM PERFORMANCE:
KSU must reorganize, modify, and maybe eliminate some academic offerings
An inclusive faculty process is critical to manage structured change
We must use metric-based indicators and qualitative context THE OTHER-SIDE OF INSTITUTIONAL PROGRAMMATIC REVIEW:
THE OTHER-SIDE OF INSTITUTIONAL PROGRAMMATIC REVIEW:
Duplication also occurs in auxiliary units
Non-academic areas often yield significant budget reductions
TOWARD A SYSTEM OF EFFECTIVENESS AND EFFICIENCY:
Regular evaluation is less high-stakes
Regular evaluation and use of data leads to program improvement