===== PAGE 1 =====
# Stockport Local Plan to 2042
Publication version (regulation 19 of the Town and Country Planning (Local Planning) (England) Regulations 2012)
September 2026
Figure 4 - Biodiversity net gain mitigation hierarchy (source: DEFRA Metric 3 guidance)
| HOM 2.3 Land off StationRoad, Reddish | HOM 2.25 Land at Cheadle Hulme School |
| HOM 2.6 Former Cheadle Brickworks | HOM 2.27 Jenny LaneHOM 2.28 and b Mill Lane(Hazel Grove) |
| HOM 2.7 Land off MidlandRoad | HOM 2.29 High Lane Farm(Woodley): |
| HOM 2.8 Land off AdswoodRoad | HOM 2.30 Sanderling RoadHOM 2.31 Compstall RoadNorth |
| HOM 2.9 Cheadle HulmeStation | HOM 2.32 Compstall RoadSouth |
| HOM 2.10 Romiley Board Mill | HOM 2.34 Shakespeare Road |
| HOM 2.12 Compstall Mills | HOM 2.35 Bolshaw Road |
| HOM 2.13 Former OffertonHigh School | HOM 2.36 Heald Green EastHOM 2.37a Land off ChesterRoad(Hazel Grove) |
| HOM 2.14 Woodford GardenVillage Extension | HOM 2.37b Norbury HallHOM 2.38 Chester Road(Woodford) |
| HOM 2.15 Hall Moss Lane | HOM 2.39 Land off BuxtonRoad, Hazel Grove |
| HOM 2.16 High Lane | HOM 2.40 Land off Occupiers Lane |
| HOM 2.17 Hyde BankMeadows | HOM 2.41 Daisy Bank, Heald Green |
| HOM 2.18 Sandown Road | HOM 2.42 |
| HOM 2.19 Jacksons Lane West | HOM 2.43 |
| HOM 2.20 Jacksons Lane East | HOM 2.44 |
| HOM 2.21 Offerton Sand and Gravel | HOM 2.45 |
| HOM 2.24 Gravel Bank Road and Unity Mill | HOM 2.46 |
### 9. Other requirements
Additionally, the following site-specific requirements must be met:
HOM 2.1 John Street, Hazel Grove
i. Applications for development should explore opportunities to provide a pedestrian and cycle route through the site from the A6 to Mount Pleasant.
===== PAGE 122 =====
### HOM 2.3 Land off Station Road, Reddish
i. Applications for the development of this site must make provision for new and improved sustainable transport and highways infrastructure including:
ii. New or improved access points in the form of priority junctions including Station Road / B6167 Gorton Road, dropped kerbs and tactile paving; and Emergency access to be facilitated via Shillingford Road in Manchester.
### HOM 2.6 Former Cheadle Brickworks
i. In order to avoid, minimise and mitigate visual impact on its context and Designated and non-designated heritage assets in its setting, the mature planting to the southern boundary of the site shall be retained / enhanced.
### HOM 2.8 Land off Adswood Road
i. In order to avoid, minimise and mitigate visual impact on its context and Designated and non-designated heritage assets in its setting, the mature planting to boundaries of the site shall be retained.
### HOM 2.9 Cheadle Hulme Station
i. In order to avoid, minimise and mitigate visual impact on its context and non-designated heritage assets in its setting, the retention of the mature planting to boundaries of the site shall be maximised.
### HOM 2.10 Romiley Board Mill
i. Applications for the development of this site must make provision for new and improved sustainable transport and highways infrastructure including:
New or improved access points into the site in the form of priority junctions, dropped kerbs and tactile paving;
New footway and possible shuttle signals under the railway bridge on Oakwood Road; and
- Improvements to the footpath towards Chadkirk Estate Country Park, including surfacing and lighting, to support walking and cycling to Marple High School.
===== PAGE 123 =====
ii. Applications for development must take appropriate account of, and not impact, the structural integrity of the infrastructure of the Peak Forest Canal.
iii. Applications for development must not result in a net increase in flows to the culvert underneath the Peak Forest Canal.
iv. Applications for development must take appropriate account of historic drainage to the Peak Forest Canal and ensure robust protection measures are adhered to in the interest of protecting the canal from contamination and pollution.
v. Any development of the site must be outside the zone of influence for Hyde Bank Tunnel.
vi. The total number of affordable homes built on the site should equal no less than 40% of homes built on the part of the site which is removed from the Green Belt by this plan plus the number of homes required to be affordable on the remaining part of the site by policy HOM 5.
vii. Applications for the development of this site must take appropriate account of and mitigate for any unacceptable adverse impacts on the nearby SBIs of Peak Forest Canal (South), and Kirk and River Woods, in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
viii. The site’s redevelopment shall secure the retention and conversion of the C19 structures on site, located to the south off Oakwood Road, which are non-designated heritage assets for the purposes of the NPPF and the Local Plan included on the GMHER and identified as key historic asset in the Peak Forest Conservation Area. Any demolition (total or partial) or substantial alteration of any non-designated heritage assets on site would have to be supported by ‘clear and convincing’ justification for the purposes of the NPPF and the Local Plan.
ix. New development shall be responsive and sympathetic to the existing non-designated heritage assets and be limited to 4 storeys, in scale remaining ancillary to the C19 Romiley Board Mill buildings. Applications for development on site shall also consider the retention of the historic stone wall along Oakwood Road to the north portion of the site.
===== PAGE 124 =====
### • HOM 2.12 Compstall Mills
i. Applications for the development of this site must mitigate for any unacceptable adverse impacts on Compstall Nature Reserve SSSI, in accordance with policy ENV 1.
ii. Applications for the development of this site must take appropriate account of, and mitigate for, any unacceptable adverse impacts on the nearby Ernocroft Wood SBI, Etherow Country Park and Roach Wood (South) SBI, and Etherow LNR in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
iii. Approximately 40% of the site lies within Flood Zone 3 associated with the River Etherow. Development proposals must apply the Sequential Test in accordance with national policy. Residential development within Flood Zone 3 will only be permitted where the Exception Test is satisfied and supported by a site-specific Flood Risk Assessment (FRA). The FRA must demonstrate that the development: provides wider sustainability benefits that outweigh flood risk; will be safe for its lifetime, taking climate change into account; and will not increase flood risk elsewhere and, where possible, reduces overall flood risk. Proposals should locate the most vulnerable uses outside Flood Zone 3 where practicable and incorporate appropriate flood mitigation, resilient design, and safe access and egress.
iv. The site’s redevelopment shall secure as far as possible the retention and conversion of the C19 mill buildings, which are non-designated heritage assets included on the Stockport Local List and identified as key historic assets in the Compstall Conservation Area Character Appraisal. Any demolition (total or partial) or substantial alteration of the non-designated heritage assets on site would have to be supported by ‘clear and convincing’ justification for the purposes of the NPPF and the Local Plan.
v. New development shall be responsive and sympathetic to the existing non-designated heritage assets and the built environment of the Compstall Conservation Area in typology, scale, form, design and the use of materials.
vi. New housing can be delivered at Compstall Mills without the need to change the boundaries of the Green Belt due to the extent of existing development at the site. The affordable housing requirement for this site is, therefore, the standard requirement for this area under policy HOM 5 and not the
===== PAGE 125 =====
requirement set out above for List 2 sites allocated by policy HOM 2a.
### HOM 2.13 Former Offerton High School
i. Applications for the development of this site must make provision for new and improved sustainable transport and highways infrastructure including:
The re-construction of the main site access roads (The Fairway and Curzon Road), to provide up-to-date standard replacement drainage, kerbs, lighting, surfacing and footways
- 20mph zone, traffic calming and provision of drop crossings on roads north of Marple Road between Graham Road and The Fairway
- Improve Marple Road/The Fairway junction, including provision of safe walking and cycling facilities and provision of crossing and bus stop improvements on Marple Road
- Provision of surfaced walking and cycle routes from the allocation (approx. 2.1km), including connection to Goyt Valley cycle route via a new foot/cycle bridge over the Goyt
ii. The site features a former playing field and therefore any applications for development on this site will need to have regard to the provisions of Policy COM 4.
iii. Applications will need to take appropriate account of, and mitigate for, any unacceptable adverse impacts of the adjacent Poise Brook and Goyt Valley SBI and Local Nature Reserve in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
iv. In order to avoid, minimise and mitigate visual impact on its context and Designated and non-designated heritage assets in its setting, the mature planting to boundaries of the site shall be retained and enhanced where possible.
### - HOM 2.14 Woodford Garden Village Extension
i. Applications for development of this site must include details of how connectivity will be achieved for walking, cycling, wheeling and public transport with the wider Woodford Garden Village and, through that, with the adjacent site allocation HOM 2.38.
ii. In order to minimise and mitigate harm to designated heritage assets (the Grade II* listed New Hall Farm and
===== PAGE 126 =====
the associated Grade II listed Barn and Garden Wall) a buffer zone, in the form of open undeveloped grounds complete with soft landscaping sited between the site and the new development should be secured as part of any new development. The development shall also secure the retention and enhancement of the soft screening (hedging and trees) to the boundaries of the site, particularly to the southwest. This can deliver the full or part of the necessary BNG contributions.
### - HOM 2.15 Hall Moss Lane
i. In order to avoid, minimise and mitigate visual impact on its context and Designated and non-designated heritage assets in its setting, the mature planting to the southern and western boundaries of the site shall be retained.
### - HOM 2.16 High Lane
i. At least 30% of the new homes must be designed specifically to meet the needs of older people, including across a range of tenures consistent with the most recently published Housing Needs Assessment.
ii. A 15 metre buffer is required along the northern boundary close to any ancient woodland designation that adjoins the site.
iii. Proposals should make suitable provision to meet the public transport needs of the allocation.
iv. Applications for the development of this site must take appropriate account of, and mitigate, for any unacceptable adverse impacts on the nearby Norbury Brook and Middlewood SBI in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
v. Applications for development on the site shall prioritise the retention of any non-designated heritage asset (Station Farmhouse, Buxton Road) on site over demolition. Any demolition (total or partial) or substantial alteration of non-designated heritage assets on site, including those identified as part of plan making and the application process, would have to be supported by ‘clear and convincing’ justification for the purposes of the NPPF and the Local Plan.
vi. The immediate setting of the Grade II listed Marsden House and the Macclesfield Canal Conservation Area shall be preserved or enhanced, with the recommended retention of the open land to the south of Buxton Road. As a minimum, an undeveloped buffer
===== PAGE 127 =====
zone complete with soft landscaping to the north and west of the Grade II listed Marsden House, and between new development and the Conservation Area, shall be provided.
### - HOM 2.17 Hyde Bank Meadows
i. Development of this site must enable the improvement and continued enjoyment by the local community of the adjacent Local Green Space (including the playing fields, play equipment, Local Nature Reserve and allotments). As a minimum this must include:
- improvements to the drainage and layout of the existing pitches alongside provision of suitable changing facilities;
• retention or replacement of the play area and multi-use games area; and
measures to enhance the nature conservation, biodiversity, health/well-being and educational value of Tangshutt Local Nature Reserve.
ii. In order to avoid, minimise and mitigate harm to the designated heritage assets in its setting, the mature planting to boundaries of the site shall be retained and enhanced where possible.
### - HOM 2.18 Sandown Road
i. Applications for the development of this site must take appropriate account of, and mitigate for, any unacceptable adverse impacts on the adjacent Threaphurst Clough and Ochreley Brook SBI in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
ii. Development must not prejudice the future delivery of new road infrastructure within the A6-M60 Protected Corridor.
iii. In order to avoid and minimise impact to the designated heritage asset and the non-designated heritage assets in its setting, the mature tree cover to the north and northwest boundaries of the site shall be retained.
#### HOM 2.19 Jacksons Lane West and HOM 2.20 Jacksons Lane East
i. Applications for the development of this site must take appropriate account of, and mitigate for any unacceptable adverse impacts, either alone or cumulatively with other nearby developments, on the nearby Lady Brook SBI and Happy Valley LNR in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
===== PAGE 128 =====
ii. In order to avoid and minimise impact to the non-designated heritage assets in its setting, a buffer of landscaped land shall be provided between the new development and the Locally Listed Norbury House Farm and Farm Building, with the retention of the existing planting to boundaries maximised.
### HOM 2.21 Offerton Sand and Gravel
i. Make provision for the remediation and restoration of the remaining part of the Offerton Sand and Gravel quarry (which is retained in the Green Belt) and its use for the creation of a publicly accessible country park; applications for development of this site must include details of how this requirement will be met, including making arrangements for the long-term management of the country park area. Walking, cycling and wheeling connectivity must be provided across the site, to enable future potential linkages with adjacent routes within the Goyt Valley.
ii. Applications for the development of this site must take appropriate account of, and mitigate for, any unacceptable adverse impacts on the nearby Poise Brook and Goyt Valley SBI and Poisebrook LNR in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
iii. Development must not prejudice the future delivery of new road infrastructure within the A6-M60 Protected Corridor.
iv. Application for any development on the site shall give particular attention to any alterations to the existing access from Marple Road and any built form to the south edge of the site and the works' impact on the designated heritage assets and non-designated heritage assets in its setting, and take up opportunities for enhancement, including through the introduction of traditional boundaries and frontages addressing the highway, reflective of the historic environment in its context.
v. In order to avoid and minimise impact on local context to the designated heritage assets and non-designated heritage assets in its setting, the existing planting to boundaries shall be retained / enhanced, with a particularly positive impact of local sense of place and views.
### HOM 2.22 Cow Lane (to rear of Sainsburys, Hazel Grove)
i. Applications for development of this site must include details of how the Fred Perry Way strategic recreation route, which passes
===== PAGE 129 =====
along Cow Lane, will be improved, providing an enhanced experience for users.
ii. Undertake hydrological and ground investigations to determine the extent and quality of any peat identified on the south western boundary of the site to inform the potential for restoration and the comprehensive masterplanning of the site.
iii. Development must include measures to ensure continued safe access and usage of the adjacent Dial Park Road Allotments, including demonstration that there would be no detriment to growing conditions. Development of this site must enable the improvement and continued enjoyment by the local community of the open space around the allotments.
iv. Development proposals must retain and improve, or re-provide and improve, the existing Blackstone Road Open Space within the allocation boundary to meet the needs of both the existing community and the future population. Improvements should be made in both quality and quantity.
v. Any proposal needs to take into account the risk of flooding, particularly in respect of those parts of the site that are identified as being within Flood Zones 2 and 3.
vi. Development must not prejudice the future delivery of new road infrastructure within the A6-M60 Protected Corridor.
### - HOM 2.23 Brindale Road
i. Applications for the development of this site must detail measures to replace the existing play area and small sided football pitches with improved facilities meeting the needs of both new and existing residents. The replacement play area and pitches must be provided prior to their removal.
### - HOM 2.24 Gravel Bank Road and Unity Mill
i. Applications for the development of this site must take appropriate account of, and mitigate for, any unacceptable adverse impacts on the nearby SBIs of Apethorne House (South), Peak Forest Canal (South), and Woodland near Unity Mills, in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
ii. The site’s redevelopment shall maximise the retention of the
Unity Mill and associated chimney, which are non-designated
heritage assets included on the Stockport Local List and
identified as key historic assets in the Peak Forest Canal
===== PAGE 130 =====
Conservation Area. Any demolition (total or partial) or substantial alteration of the non-designated heritage assets on site would have to be supported by ‘clear and convincing’ justification for the purposes of the NPPF and the Local Plan. Should demolition be required and justified, an on-site interpretation and full recording of the Unity Mill will be required.
iii. Application for any development on site shall give particular attention to the west portion of the site, where the site is included within and borders the Peak Forest Canal Conservation Area. The planting along the Peak Forest Canal shall be retained and enhanced where possible.
iv. Access across the Peak Forest Canal (Canal Bridge) shall be retained.
### - HOM 2.25 Land at Cheadle Hulme School
i. Application for any development on site shall give particular attention to the provision of residential access from Hulme Hall Road due to the anticipated impact on the designated heritage assets and non-designated heritage assets to the north off the plot.
ii. The scale of any development on site shall be limited to 3 storeys, to preserve the townscape interest and landmark status of the Grade II Listed Cheadle Hulme School.
iii. The soft screening to the site’s north boundaries shall be preserved or enhanced, to minimise the development’s impact on the designated heritage assets and non-designated heritage assets in its setting.
iv. In bringing forward proposals for (at least) the number of homes specified in policy HOM 2a, consideration should be given to the retention of land to help meet the future needs of Cheadle Hulme School.
### HOM 2.26 Dairyground Farm
i. Applications for the development of this site must take appropriate account of, and mitigate for any unacceptable adverse impacts, either alone or cumulatively with other nearby developments, on the nearby Lady Brook SBI and Happy Valley LNR in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
===== PAGE 131 =====
### HOM 2.27 Jenny Lane
i. The form, position, density, appearance and design of any new development shall reflect the existing context of the site including the Grade II listed Moor Farm and the Birch Cottage and consider the delivery of highway facing dwellings complete with front and rear gardens, whilst ensuring that development makes effective use of the land.
### - HOM 2.29 High Lane Farm (Woodley)
i. In order to minimise and mitigate harm to the Grade II Listed Baker Cottage, a buffer zone should be included, in the form of open undeveloped grounds complete with landscaping sited between the dwelling at 67-79 Oxford Drive and the curtilage of the designated heritage asset. The buffer zone should include no built form other than an access road and associated infrastructure, which shall be sited away from the designated heritage assets.
ii. The mature planting on the southwest boundary of the Grade II listed Baker Cottage and to the west and north boundaries of the site shall be retained.
### - HOM 2.30 Sanderling Road
i. Applications for development of this site must have specific regard to National Grid guidance on safe development near to overhead lines92 and associated design guidance93.
ii. Development must not prejudice the future delivery of new road infrastructure within the A6-M60 Protected Corridor.
### - HOM 2.31 Compstall Road North
i. The development shall consider providing a buffer of undeveloped strip of land and/or soft screening between the development and the adjacent non-designated heritage assets, including the Locally Listed Gothic Lodge/Farm and Greyhound Inn included on the GMHER.
===== PAGE 132 =====
### - HOM 2.32 Compstall Road South
i. Applications for development of this site must have specific regard to National Grid guidance on safe development near to overhead lines94 and associated design guidance95.
ii. Applications for the development of this site must take appropriate account of, and mitigate for, any unacceptable adverse impacts on the nearby Redbrow Wood SBI in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
iii. The mature planting on the southern and southeastern boundaries of the site shall be retained, to retain screening between the development and Compstall Conservation Area.
iv. Application for any development on site shall retain the original stone boundary to Compstall Road, which continues to the curtilage of Compstall Hall within Compstall Conservation Area, and the historic hard standing.
### - HOM 2.33 Heald Green West
i. Applications for development of this site must include proposals to provide replacement playing pitches, or to improve the existing playing pitches, such that they are better able to meet the needs of the existing local community as well as contributing towards meeting the needs of the new population.
ii. Development proposals must include measures to ensure that residents have safe and convenient access to Heald Green Station and Heald Green Local Centre.
### - HOM 2.34 Shakespeare Road
i. Applications for the development of this site must take appropriate account of, and mitigate for, any unacceptable adverse impacts on the nearby Vernon Road Wood SBI in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
ii. Development must not prejudice the future delivery of new road infrastructure within the A6-M60 Protected Corridor.
iii. In order to avoid or minimise visual impact of the development on designated heritage assets (Grade II Listed Barn Immediately
===== PAGE 133 =====
East Of Bredbury Hall, Grade II Listed Goyt Farm and Barn) the mature planting to the boundaries of the site shall be retained (south) and enhanced (north).
### - HOM 2.36 Heald Green East
i. Applications for development of this site must set aside land to be used for the provision of a new station/travel hub, including park and ride facilities.
ii. Applications for development of this site must include proposals to replace or improve the existing recreational open space accessed from Dawson Road, such that it is better able to meet the needs of the existing local community as well as contributing towards meeting the needs of the new population.
iii. Application for any development on site should give particular attention to the provision of residential access from Stanley Road, which shall be sited and designed to avoid or minimise harm to the Designated and non-designated heritage assets.
iv. The mature planting (trees and hedgerow) along Stanley Road and to the boundaries with the non-designated heritage assets (Gill Bent Farm and Ivy Cottage) shall be retained and enhanced where possible.
#### HOM 2.37a Land off Chester Road (Hazel Grove) and HOM 2.37b Norbury Hall
i. Applications for the development of these sites must take appropriate account of, and mitigate for any unacceptable adverse impacts, either alone or cumulatively with other nearby developments, on the nearby Lady Brook SBI and Happy Valley LNR in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
ii. An active travel route between sites HOM 2.37 a) and HOM 2.37b) linking the two sites is essential to ensure walking, wheeling and cycling is optimised. This ensures inter-connectivity between the two elements of the allocation, thereby assisting in ensuring sustainable patterns of growth are in line with the NPPF.
iii. The site’s redevelopment shall secure the retention and conversion of the Locally Listed Norbury Hall Stables. Any demolition (total or partial) or substantial alteration of the existing structures would have to be supported by ‘clear and convincing’ justification.
===== PAGE 134 =====
iv. Application for any development on site shall retain the original stone boundary to Locally Listed Norbury Hall, at the entrance to the allocated site (HOM 2.37b).
v. Application for any development on site should give particular attention to the provision of residential access, which shall be sited and designed to avoid or minimise impact on the non-designated heritage assets.
vi. In order to limit impact on non-designated heritage assets, the planting to boundaries and between the new development and these assets shall be retained or enhanced where possible.
### HOM 2.38 Chester Road (Woodford)
i. Applications for development of this site must include details of how connectivity will be achieved for walking, cycling, wheeling and public transport with the adjacent Woodford Garden Village.
ii. Part of this site provides its most westerly access to Chester Road, between existing properties. This narrow strip of land is retained in the Green Belt.
iii. The site’s redevelopment shall secure the retention and conversion of Pump Farm on Chester Road, which is a non-designated heritage asset for the purposes of the NPPF and the Local Plan, and which contributed to the significance of the Grade II Listed 475 Chester Road. Any demolition (total or partial) or substantial alteration of the existing structures would have to be supported by ‘clear and convincing’ justification. The Pillbox, which is a non-designated heritage asset for the purposes of the NPPF and the Local Plan, should be retained unless its demolition meets the relevant tests set out in the Local Plan and the NPPF.
iv. Application for any development on site should give particular attention to the preservation or enhancement of the setting of the Grade II Listed 474 Chester Road and the Grade II Listed Old Hall Farmhouse and Barn as designated heritage asset, including through the siting and design of residential access and form, layout and appearance of new development.
v. A buffer of undeveloped land complete with planting shall be provided between the development and the designated heritage assets to the south (Grade II Listed Old Hall Farmhouse and Barn).
===== PAGE 135 =====
### - HOM 2.39 Land off Buxton Road, Hazel Grove
i. Development must not prejudice the future delivery of new road infrastructure within the A6-M60 Protected Corridor.
### - HOM 2.40 Land off Occupiers Lane
i. Development must not prejudice the future delivery of new road infrastructure within the A6-M60 Protected Corridor.
ii. Applications for the development of this site must take appropriate account of, and mitigate for, any unacceptable adverse impacts on the nearby Ox Hey Pasture SBI in accordance with Policy ENV 1.
### - HOM 2.41 Daisy Bank, Heald Green
i. The site’s development shall secure the complete retention of the Daisy Bank Farm, which is a non-designated heritage asset for the purposes of the NPPF and the Local Plan, and which has important group value with other non-designated heritage assets in this location and forms a key part of the original settlement of Heald Green.
ii. To limit impact of the development on the non-designated heritage assets on site and in its setting, the planting to boundaries and between the new development and these assets shall be retained and enhanced where possible.
## Explanation
294) The policy requirements set out for each site are intended to ensure that development is acceptable in planning terms. In particular, the requirements for those sites in List 2 are intended to meet the expectations of NPPF known as the ‘Golden Rules.’ This is subject to viability assessment as stated in national planning practice guidance.
295) The requirement for design codes ensures that schemes of a significant size will deliver good design and be delivered in a holistic way. Linked to this, phasing strategies are important in setting out how large developments will be delivered and when any other requirements of a scheme will be delivered to ensure that the relevant infrastructure is delivered at the correct time. It is important that local communities are involved at an early stage and in line with other requirements under part 3 of this policy. The NPPF sets out the benefits of early engagement and consultation.
===== PAGE 136 =====
296) The requirements for a mix of housing, including affordable housing, are set out in policies HOM 4 and HOM 5 and are necessary to ensure that a variety of housing types and tenure are delivered to meet various needs in the borough.
297) Likewise, the requirements to deliver necessary infrastructure improvements and the provision of green space relate to the relevant policies and are required to ensure that the developments are delivering the necessary elements required to make the scheme suitable in planning terms at each stage of development.
298) Other individual requirements for sites are set out where they are currently known, specific to those sites. This is not intended, at this stage, to be an exhaustive list of site-specific policies. Further and more detailed site specific policies will be developed over the course of the plan as more detailed work on the sites is undertaken to understand exactly what is required to deliver these sites.
## HOM 3: Protecting the future supply of housing
1. To support the delivery of new homes, the council will prioritise residential development on brownfield land within the borough. To achieve this:
a. outside of the centres and employment areas identified on the policies map, the council will require wholly residential development, or the inclusion of a significant element of residential development, in proposals for the reuse of buildings or brownfield land;
b. within centres identified on the policies map, the council will require the incorporation of an element of residential development in proposals for the reuse of buildings or brownfield land; and
c. within employment areas identified on the policies map, where there would be no demonstrable harm to either living conditions or the operation of existing employment uses, the council will require the incorporation of an element of residential development in proposals for the reuse of buildings or brownfield land.
2. Proposals that depart from the approach set out in this policy will need to demonstrate that it would be technically infeasible or financially not viable to deliver residential development on the site.
## Explanation
299) There is a clear requirement from government to significantly boost the supply of new homes. As part of the presumption in favour of sustainable development
===== PAGE 137 =====
policies should, as a minimum, provide for objectively assessed needs for housing and other uses.
300) The majority of the council’s housing target will be provided on sites identified through the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA)96. However, we acknowledge that there are unallocated sites that have the potential to come forward for residential development in accordance with other Local Plan policies.
301) We recognise that there is increasing pressure to release greenfield and Green Belt land. To alleviate this pressure, we have committed to building the majority of new homes on brownfield land as outlined in Strategic Policy 1: Spatial Strategy. It is expected that any unplanned land to come forward during the plan period is likely to be brownfield land. As such, it is important that these sites are prioritised for residential development.
302) Government advice stresses the importance of making effective use of land. Historically, there have been sites suitable for residential development within Stockport which have been lost to other uses. Therefore, this policy seeks to ensure that housing is considered on those sites not allocated for another purpose.
303) Furthermore, housing in Stockport has often been delivered on smaller sites. The evidence provided within the SHLAA97 demonstrates that delivery on small sites is forecasted to continue through the plan period. Added together, these small, unallocated sites will help to deliver our housing target. Any sites coming forward in this way will need to comply with all relevant housing policies and other relevant policies of this plan.
304) We recognise that a range of uses will be encouraged within the designated centres to support their role in the heart of their communities. This also supports the principles set out within the Stockport Town Centre and Centres policies. Therefore, this policy applies flexibility to developments in those areas. Residential development in the designated centres will be expected to comply with the requirements set out within the relevant Stockport Town Centre and Centres policies (including STC 1 and 5 and CEN 1 and 3).
305) There may also be opportunities to include residential development on sites designated for other land uses through the Local Plan. In these instances, we will analyse the suitability of including residential development on a site by site basis. This level of flexibility ensures that the Local Plan is reflective of market changes.
===== PAGE 138 =====
## HOM 4: Housing mix
1. Residential development should provide a mix of dwelling types and sizes in order to create sufficient choice of housing stock. This will deliver housing to meet the varying needs of current and future residents.
2. In Stockport the priorities are for:
a. affordable homes: 2 and 3 bedroom properties are the highest priority for homes for Social/Affordable Rent and Shared Ownership;
b. market homes (sale and rent): 3 bedroom properties are the highest priority, homes with 2 or 4 bedrooms are a medium priority; and
c. housing for older people: level access and age-friendly design. This is not restricted to a particular house type, and innovative design is encouraged in delivering housing for older people.
3. The council will have regard to the following criteria in assessing the mix of housing schemes:
a. Most recent Housing Needs Assessment for Stockport98;
b. The ability of the site to accommodate a mix of housing - full consideration will need to be given to the site and its context;
c. Density requirements as set in ENV 14; and
d. Where the density falls below those set in ENV 14, the applicant will be expected to provide supporting information justifying the density proposed.
## Explanation
306) It will be important that a range of housing is delivered to meet the needs of Stockport residents. Development will be expected to provide variety in terms of tenure, price, type and size. Residential development should cater for new forming households. first time buvers. families with children. disabled and older people.
307) The council's latest Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) highlights that a mix of housing needs to be delivered. The HNA also states that development should have regard to the differing needs across the borough. There is a particular focus on ensuring that the housing and support needs of older people are met.
===== PAGE 139 =====
308) The overall mix outlined in the current HNA (2025) for market housing recommends an overall need for approximately 75-80% houses, 5-10% flats, and 10-15% accessible accommodation.
309) The overall mix outlined in the current HNA (2025) for affordable/social rented housing is approximately 60-65% houses, 25-30% flats and 5-10% accessible accommodation. For shared ownership properties, the equivalent figures are 75-80% houses, 10-15% flats and 10-15% accessible accommodation.
310) It is important to recognise that there are significant differences between the needs of different areas of the borough. The HNA provides a detailed assessment of these needs and so developers should have regard to this evidence base. We will use this to inform negotiations between the Council and developers and to determine the appropriate mix of housing.
311) The needs of the borough may change over time. New developments should therefore have regard to the most up-to-date assessment of housing need.
## HOM 5: Affordable housing
1. To address the significant affordable housing need in Stockport, all major housing development (10 or more homes) will be expected to deliver affordable housing on site, meeting a range of affordable housing needs. Tenure prices will be linked to incomes in the borough and not linked to the value of properties.
2. Affordable housing is not an optional requirement and must be factored into the price paid for the site in question.
3. Development proposals will be expected to deliver at least the following proportions of affordable housing:
| Site type (area) | Fewer than 100 homes | 100 or more homes |
| Previously developed land (lower viability) | 5% | 10% |
| Previously developed land (middle viability) | 5% | 10% |
| Previously developed land (higher viability) | 10% | 15% |
| Greenfield (lower viability) | 5% | 10% |
| Greenfield (middle viability) | 10% | 15% |
| Greenfield (higher viability) | 40% | 40% |
| Green Belt (lower viability) | 5% | 10% |
| Green Belt (middle viability) | 15% | 20% |
| Green Belt (higher viability) | 45% | 50% |
4. Any proposal which seeks to deliver a lower level of affordable provision to that stated above, must present robust evidence to justify a reduced or alternative
===== PAGE 140 =====
form of contribution wherever policy requirements relating to affordable housing
(including size, type, mix and tenure) cannot be met on site, including for
viability reasons. On sites in lower viability areas and on previously developed
sites in middle viability areas, applicants should demonstrate that external
grant funding has been sought to cross-subsidise schemes in these
circumstances.
5. The requirements for previously developed land and greenfield sites apply to all relevant developments within the existing built-up area of the borough. The requirements for Green Belt sites apply to all relevant developments (whether they are previously developed land or greenfield) on land within the Green Belt or on land which is removed from the Green Belt by this plan.
6. Review and clawback mechanisms may be used in section 106 agreements to reassess viability over the lifetime of the development.
7. Affordable housing will be sought on all council owned sites to be developed for housing, regardless of size.
8. As high a proportion of affordable dwellings for social rent should be provided in lower viability areas as possible, with the remainder delivered as shared ownership/intermediate housing. In middle and higher viability areas the split sought is 50/50 between shared ownership/intermediate and social rent.
9. The mix of house type and tenure of affordable housing should be consistent with the latest published Housing Needs Assessment for Stockport.
10. The council will take account of requirements of external funders of affordable housing, such as Homes England when considering tenure and housing mix.
11. Revisions to housing mix may be negotiated if larger dwellings are required subject to the level of any subsidy remaining unchanged.
12. Specialist housing that does not provide self-contained homes such as nursing and children's homes will not be expected to provide affordable housing for these units.
13. Wherever a residential development is delivered in multiple phases, affordable housing should be provided in each phase unless it would be demonstrably unviable to do so. The number, type and tenure of affordable dwellings for each phase should be specified. Affordable housing should be fully integrated within the layout.
14. Affordable housing should be delivered on site. Exceptionally, a reduced level of on-site provision may be acceptable, with the remainder of the requirement provided off-site through a financial contribution secured by a section 106 agreement. Off-site provision will only be considered acceptable where
===== PAGE 141 =====
evidence demonstrates that to do so would realise benefits which clearly outweigh the benefits of on-site provision.
## Explanation
312) A whole plan viability assessment has been carried out for Stockport and the affordable housing policy is based upon three viability areas according to the viability assessment. These relate to lower, middle and higher viability areas. Grey belt sites are treated as green belt sites, not brownfield. The evidence indicates what levels of affordable housing a particular area can viably provide, in line with national guidance which stresses that planning policies should not undermine the viability of the plan. Where it is robustly demonstrated that the provision of affordable housing would make a scheme unviable, the requirement for a lower level of provision of affordable housing will be considered in line with the policy. In these exceptional circumstances, a clear justification supported by an independent viability assessment will be required. The costs of subsequently reviewing this work on behalf of the Council will be borne by the applicant.
313) Between January 2016 to November 2025, average property prices in Stockport have risen by approximately 63% since the lowest recorded value, seen in January 2016 (£188,215). Over the same period, this percentage increase is higher than that which was seen nationally (41%) but is lower than that seen across Greater Manchester (around 78%). Property prices in Stockport have historically remained broadly in line with national averages. As of November 2025, the average property price in Stockport was £306,725 which is approximately 23% higher than the average price seen in Greater Manchester (£236,016) and approximately 4% higher than the national average (£293,913). The borough of Trafford is understood to have the highest average price at £377,588. Wigan is understood to have the lowest average property price at £190,873.
314) The council's most recent Housing Needs Assessment (HNA) was published in 2025 and identifies a total of 13,455 existing households in housing need, which represents 11.7% of all households across Stockport. The assessment also found that there is a net annual affordable housing shortfall of 1,035 dwellings. This accounts for around 55% of the Local Housing Need. Delivering affordable housing is therefore a key strategic objective for this Plan, subject to viability. It is also important to note that this need varies significantly across different areas within the borough.
315) House prices across the borough vary significantly. To deliver affordable housing that meets the needs of the local community, the proportion of affordable housing sought varies across the borough according to viability, set out in evidence associated with whole plan viability. It is intended that this will take account of need, property prices and local context and what development can viably provide in affordable housing terms.
316) The HNA identifies ‘townships’ across Stockport in which affordable housing needs vary. The council will use the most recent version of the HNA to help determine the level and mix of affordable housing
===== PAGE 142 =====
317) In terms of affordable housing mix, the current Housing Needs Assessment (2025) suggests that an overall affordable dwelling mix of 55% houses and 45% level access accommodation (including flats and bungalows) would meet the needs of the borough. While this is noted, the mix of affordable housing provided in development will be based upon the findings of the most up-to-date evidence.
318) We are aware that the number of households with specialist housing requirements is going to increase during the lifetime of the plan. Therefore, it is important that the provision of specialist and supported housing for older people, people with a disability and other vulnerable groups are also accounted for in the delivery of affordable housing when it can viably be provided.
319) The delivery of on-site affordable housing contributions is crucial to meeting our identified need and the creation of mixed, sustainable communities. The provision of affordable housing off site cannot necessarily meet those needs in the same way. As such, the financial contribution of off-site provision should exceed that of on-site provision. This will only ever be accepted in ‘exceptional circumstances’.
## HOM 6: Build to rent
1. The council will support build to rent proposals where the following criteria are met:
a. Demonstrate that whole development is under common ownership and management;
b. Offer longer tenancy agreements of 3 years or more to all tenants, with tenants having the option to terminate at one month's notice, after the first six months, without a break fee being payable;
c. Provide liveable residential developments in accordance with all relevant local plan policies; and
d. Provide a mix of unit sizes and types informed by the findings of the most up-to-date housing needs assessment.
2. Schemes above the council's affordable housing size thresholds must provide the proportions set out in policy HOM 5. These dwellings will be:
a. At a range of genuinely affordable rents that is reflective of incomes to meet affordable housing need in Stockport;
b. Maintained as affordable private rent in perpetuity unless it is clearly impracticable to maintain the properties as this tenure;
===== PAGE 143 =====
c. Designed to be tenure blind and distributed throughout the wider development; and
d. Occupied by eligible tenants, having regard to local household income levels and local rent levels, housing need and links to the local area as agreed between the council and operator.
## Explanation
320) Build to rent schemes are purpose built dwellings for rent and are defined as such in the National Planning Policy Framework. Nationally, the build to rent sector has grown significantly over recent years. Stockport has received an increase in the number of planning applications for these types of developments.
321) Build to rent schemes can be beneficial in accelerating the delivery of new homes as well as increasing the range of housing choice in the borough. It is acknowledged that build to rent schemes normally comprise apartments. Despite this, it is important that a mix of unit sizes are provided which reflect the council's most recent assessment of housing needs.
322) Further to this, build to rent schemes will also be expected to provide appropriate levels of affordable housing. This affordable housing will be provided in the form of affordable rent, with discounts calculated using local incomes. The council will prepare guidance providing more detail in respect of these matters.
## HOM 7: Housing for older people and specialist accommodation
1. Housing provision for older people and specialist accommodation will be supported where it is well-integrated into the wider neighbourhood.
2. A mix of housing provision specifically targeted at older people, which forms part of the overall mix within new residential developments, should be delivered accordance with HOM 4.
3. In addition, the range of specialist accommodation, often targeted at older people will be supported where it:
a. is reflective of the findings outlined within the most up-to-date housing needs assessment;
b. delivers homes that meet the optional standard in Building Regulations M4(3) wheelchair user dwellings, also having regard to the requirements of policy ENV 15;
===== PAGE 144 =====
c. is well-integrated with the wider neighbourhood;
d. offers easy access to community facilities, local services and public transport;
e. meets parking standards across a range of users;
f. includes suitable outdoor space for both residents and visitors; and
g. is designed to reflect the principles of relevant best practice;
4. The provision of affordable housing in line with policy HOM 5 will be supported where the provision is for units that provide accommodation whereby occupants could reasonably support themselves.
## Explanation
323) The projections for Stockport indicate an increased ageing of the population over time. Consequently, a range of housing options will be required to meet the needs of older people. Homes should allow people to live independently and retain control over their accommodation and services. The requirements of the policy seek to deliver housing which will meet a range of needs for older people's residential accommodation.
324) A key strategic objective for Greater Manchester is to increase the supply of homes that meet the needs and aspirations of all ages. Locally, Stockport are working towards becoming an age-friendly borough and have developed an All Age Living prospectus99. When proposing housing for older people and age-friendly places we will expect developments to reflect the most relevant best practice. Specialist housing for older people must incorporate infection prevention and control principles in its design and operation, in line with NHS England Health Building Note 00-09 and the Health and Social Care Act 2008 Code of Practice. This includes measures to support ventilation, hygiene, and outbreak management, ensuring resilience against infectious disease risks.
325) Current best practice also includes the design principles such as those set out in the Housing our Ageing Population Panel for Innovation (HAPPI) Report. For much of the housing that will be suited for older people there is no reason why this should separate from other forms of residential provision. Its inclusion within wider housing developments is an important part of creating sustainable mixed communities and for this reason the policy encourages such development.
326) Specialist accommodation is not limited to that for older people, but it can include care homes, extra care housing and sheltered housing. Such schemes should be able to demonstrate need and how they are contributing to the delivery of council
===== PAGE 145 =====
strategies and priorities. I his may involve the remodelling of existing older persons' accommodation to meet changing needs. Affordable housing is necessary to meet the needs of those who are otherwise unable to afford open market homes. The affordable requirements of older people tend to be different to those who are seeking to purchase their first home. The council will prepare guidance setting out a preferred method of delivery.
## HOM 8: Provision and enhancement of outdoor recreational space in new residential development
1. Developers are required to make provision for meeting the outdoor recreational needs arising from new residential development in accordance with the following standards. The standards cover 3 headline typologies within which a number of different more detailed typologies must be considered.
Open space (total requirement = 32m² per person)
Parks and gardens = 8.0m² per person
Amenity greenspace = 6.0m² per person
• Natural and semi-natural = 18.0m² per person
Outdoor sports (total requirement = 16 m2 per person)
• Sports pitches = 12.0m² per person
• Courts, greens, tracks and trails = 4.0m² per person
Play space (total requirement = 5.5m² per person)
• Equipped designated play areas = 2.5m² per person
• Informal play provision = 3.0m² per person
2. For the purposes of this policy, the indicative population of a development will be calculated as the total number of bedrooms plus one person per dwelling. Any pre-existing bedrooms lost as a consequence of the development will be calculated on the same basis.
3. Where a proposal is for the creation of a new home or homes in multiple occupation (HMO) the population will be calculated as 1 person per bedroom limited to single-occupancy by the HMO licensing regime and 2 persons per bedroom not limited to single-occupancy.
4. New homes with age-restricted occupancy (exclusively to meet the needs of older people) in line with the requirements of policy HOM 7 will not be expected to contribute to the provision of play space. Where registered older people's accommodation is provided, the population (for the purposes of calculating open space and outdoor sports needs) will be taken to be the registered capacity of the facility or facilities.
===== PAGE 146 =====
5. Provision for additional outdoor recreational space within the relevant typologies will only be required to the extent that the needs arising from the development cannot be met by pre-existing sufficientencies in provision. This will be considered within the Area Committee area for open space and play space, and across the borough as a whole for outdoor sports. It will be evidenced by the Open Space Assessment, Playing Pitch Strategy or other robust, up-to-date evidence, including monitoring of change in provision arising as a consequence of development. This does not negate the need for larger developments (with an indicative population of 100 or more people) to ensure that there is at least 100m2 of play and social interaction space suitable for toddlers that might be accessed within 100m walking distance of every home.
6. The sports pitches requirement, within the outdoor sports headline typology, may alternatively be calculated using the Sport England Playing Pitch Calculator. In doing this the Playing Pitch Strategy’s high priority actions should be used to establish a specific scheme to which contributions for off-site provision might be made. Regard must be had, however, to any more up-to-date prioritisation or technical work undertaken by the council subsequent to the Playing Pitch Strategy. As neither the Sport England Playing Pitch Calculator nor the Playing Pitch Strategy have regard to all types of sports pitch that could be provided under this policy, prioritisation or technical work which is more recent than the Playing Pitch Strategy might identify that this approach is not the most suitable way of delivering strategic priorities for outdoor sports in any given part of the borough.
7. Provision should be in line with the following sequential approach, with as much need for each typology of outdoor recreational space being met at each sequentially preferable level before the remainder is met at the next level down.
Open space: 1) On-site then 2) financial contribution towards provision within the Area Committee area and then 3) financial contribution towards provision elsewhere in the borough.
Outdoor sports: 1) On-site and then 2) financial contribution towards provision elsewhere in the borough.
- Play space: 1) On-site then 2) financial contribution towards provision within the Area Committee area and then 3) financial contribution towards provision elsewhere in the borough.
8. Notwithstanding this sequential approach to provision, there may be circumstances in which the council considers that off-site provision is preferable because it would help deliver strategic scale facilities to meet the collective needs of a number of different developments. This is most likely to be the case in relation to outdoor sports provision, where the majority of developments are not likely to have either the land available or significant enough a population to make the provision of complete facilities possible.
===== PAGE 147 =====
9. Where a proposal will result in the loss of existing open space, outdoor sports provision or play space the loss must be considered separately under policy COM 4. In such cases, however, it may be that a combined solution can meet the requirements of COM 4 whilst also meeting the additional needs arising from the new residential development.
### 10. On-site provision
On-site provision will not be required where the indicative population of a proposed development is less than 100 people, meaning that such developments will be required to meet their need by making a financial contribution towards off-site provision in accordance with the sequential approach set out above. This does not, however, preclude such developments from seeking to meet all or part of their identified needs on-site.
11. Where equipped designated play areas are required on-site the following process must be followed:
===== PAGE 148 =====
STEP 1: It must be ensured that there is at least 100m2 of play and social interaction space suitable for toddlers that might be accessed within 100m walking distance of every home. The council's preference is that this is distributed across the development to provide stimulating, welcoming and multi-generational opportunities for informal 'play on the way' rather than as specific, standalone Local Areas for Play (LAPs). As with LAPs, such opportunities do not require formal play equipment but might, instead, feature low-level structures, natural materials (like timber or sand) or sensory elements to encourage imaginative play set alongside walking routes or within the wider public realm. A development may need to exceed the total requirement set out in clause 1 above if it is necessary to achieve the distance/area requirements.
Is the remaining amount of unmet need less than 400m2?
Yes