Table 5.9: Vegetative and flowering characteristics of six populations of pawpaw evaluated in 2004, KSU Germplasm Orchard, Frankfort, Ky.
Statetrunk cross sectional areatotal number of flowerslength of flowering (days)flower peakflower densityn
IN158.9 ± 16.2 a586.7 ± 127.6 ab21.4 ± 1.9 ab2.3 ± 0.3 b10.4 ± 3.1 ab10
IN235.4 ± 16.0 c395.1 ± 219.3 cd22.0 ± 4.4 ab2.2 ± 0.3 b10.1 ± 3.9 ab8
KY53.8 ± 21.8 a467.0 ± 151.2 bc20.0 ± 0.6 bc2.7 ± 0.3 a9.3 ± 3.1 b21
MD41.0 ± 13.2 bc482.0 ± 197.9 bc21.4 ± 2.1 ab2.3 ± 0.4 b12.4 ± 5.3 a14
NY51.1 ± 16.9 ab611.8 ± 141.7 a22.2 ± 2.2 a2.2 ± 0.3 b12.3 ± 1.8 a23
WV39.4 ± 16.6 bc314.2 ± 184.2 d18.8 ± 3.9 c2.9 ± 0.5 a7.7 ± 4.1 b13
P-value0.0098**0.0000***0.0024**0.0000***0.0018**
Table 5.10: Fruiting characteristics of six populations of pawpaw evaluated in 2004, KSU Germplasm Orchard, Frankfort, Ky.
IN2 11.8 55.9 1.8 72.6 100.1 8.1 0.20 17.0 1.5 2396
KY 15.2 69.4 2.3 117.4 73.9 9.0 0.18 23.3 2.1 2561
MD 8.8 37.8 3.0 98.7 112.4 10.9 0.26 18.4 1.8 2457
NY 11.4 65.1 2.3 130.6 95.9 12.1 0.25 21.0 1.2 2262
WV 8.0 24.6 1.8 39.1 137.6 7.2 0.16 13.1 2.2 2577
P-value .0552 0.0004 0.0000 .0000 .0000 0.1047 0.0904 .0026 .0000 .0000
State fruit set (%) total number of clusters number of fruit per cluster number of fruit per tree fruit weight (g) Yield (kg) Yield Efficiency length of harvest (days) harvest peak growing degree for ripening
IN1 14.3 83.1 2.7 127.8 98.9 12.8 0.23 20.4 2.1 2527
± 8.6 ± 43.9 a ± 0.7 ab ± 50.3 a ± 23.1 b ± 6.2 ± 0.13 ± 2.3 ab ± 0.6 a ± 150 ab
± 7.5 ± 45.1 ab ± 0.5 d ± 54.1 bc ± 19.1 b ± 4.8 ± 0.12 ± 8.7 bc ± 0.4 bc ± 163 b
± 10.0 ± 46.7 a ± 0.8 bc ± 60.6 a ± 21.5 c ± 5.8 ± 0.09 ± 5.0 a ± 0.5 a ± 112 a
± 4.9 ± 20.5 bc ± 1.9 a ± 5.6 ab ± 31.8 b ± 5.6 ± 0.10 ± 5.9 b ± 0.8 ab ± 204 b
± 5.5 ± 24.1 a ± 0.5 c ± 50.0 a ± 24.3 b ± 4.8 ± 0.10 ± 5.9 ab ± 0.4 c ± 93 c
± 6.8 ± 21.5 c ± 0.8 d ± 7.5 c ± 44.4 a ± 7.5 ± 0.16 ± 9.4 c ± 0.7 a ± 129 a
*** *** *** *** ** * *