Empirical Regression Results

The estimated parameters from the logit and probit models are presented in Table 2. Table 3 reports the estimated marginal effects for the likelihood to sample pawpaw and sorghum syrup products. The estimated parameters are compared between the logit and probit models for paw-paw and sorghum in Tables 2 and 3.

Table 2. Results of Logit and Probit Models for the Likelihood to Sample for the Products

Dependent VariablePawpawSorghum
EstimatorLogitProbitLogitProbit
Female-0.689**-0.422**-0.999***-0.606***
Age-0.013***-0.008***-0.012***-0.007***
Age*Female0.014***0.008***0.017***0.010***
White0.292***0.181***0.365***0.224***
Have kids0.0640.040-0.026-0.016
Education0.453**0.284**0.039**0.023**
Education2-0.014*-0.009*--
Income0.0010.00060.00050.0003
Rural0.1560.0960.219**0.131**
MO-0.080-0.0500.335**0.206**
KY0.295*0.180*0.694***0.418***
TN-0.039-0.0240.582***0.357***
WV0.1660.1000.475**0.290**
VA-0.160-0.0980.0250.015
IL-0.059-0.0360.0940.057
IN0.0990.0620.1300.081
constant-2.668-1.6750.1650.102
Log Likelihood-2241.898-2241.924-2203.740-2203.945
LR χ237.57037.52071.40070.990
Pseudo R20.0080.0080.0150.015
N. of observations3406340634063406
Correctly predict62.33%62.33%64.06%64.12%
Homoscedasticity testyesyesyesyes

Note: Asterisks indicate levels of significance: * = 0.10, ** = 0.05, and **** = 0.01.

Many estimated coefficients of the demographic characteristic variables are significant for both products. Race (white), gender (male), education, and residence (rural – for sorghum) have positive effects, while age has a negative effect.

The results showed stronger state-by-state differences for sorghum products than for pawpaw products with particularly higher likelihood to sample products in the deep southern states. Consumers in Kentucky were 7% more likely to have higher sampling interest compared to those in Ohio for pawpaw products; other state effects were not significant. Consumers in other states were more likely to have higher sampling interest than Ohio for sorghum products, including Kentucky (16%), Tennessee (13%), West Virginia (11%), and Missouri (8%). No differences were observed for consumers in Virginia, Illinois, or Indiana.