NSSE 2019 Engagement Indicators Comparisons with High-Performing Institutions Kentucky State University
Comparisons with Top 50% and Top 10% Institutions
While NSSE's policy is not to rank institutions (see nsse.indiana.edu/links/PNP), the results below are designed to compare the engagement of your students with those attending two groups of institutions identified by NSSEa for their high average levels of student engagement:
institutions with average scores placing them in the top 50% of all 2018 and 2019 NSSE institutions, and
institutions with average scores placing them in the top 10% of all 2018 and 2019 NSSE institutions.
While the average scores for most institutions are below the mean for the top 50% or top 10%, your institution may show areas of distinction where your average student was as engaged as (or even more engaged than) the typical student at high-performing institutions. A check mark (✓) signifies those comparisons where your average score was at least comparableb to that of the high-performing group. However, the presence of a check mark does not necessarily mean that your institution was a member of that group.
It should be noted that most of the variability in student engagement is within, not between, institutions. Even "high-performing" institutions have students with engagement levels below the average for all institutions.
First-Year Students K-State Your first-year students compared with
NSSE Top 50% NSSE Top 10%
Theme Engagement Indicator Mean Mean Effect size ✓ Mean Effect size ✓
Academic Challenge Higher-Order Learning 31.0 39.3** -.64 41.0*** -.77
Reflective and Integrative Learning 31.2 36.8** -.47 38.8*** -.64
Learning Strategies 32.3 39.9** -.56 42.5*** -.73
Quantitative Reasoning 24.6 29.3 -.31 30.8* -.41
Learning with Peers Collaborative Learning 33.2 35.4 -.16 37.7* -.33
Discussions with Diverse Others 32.9 41.3** -.56 43.2*** -.72
Experiences with Faculty Student-Faculty Interaction 24.6 24.9 -.02 ✓ 28.0 -.22
Effective Teaching Practices 29.8 40.6*** -.82 42.7*** -.92
Campus Environment Quality of Interactions 41.2 44.9 -.32 47.1** -.50
Supportive Environment 30.5 38.1** -.58 40.1*** -.73
Seniors K-State Your seniors compared with
NSSE Top 50% NSSE Top 10%
Theme Engagement Indicator Mean Mean Effect size ✓ Mean Effect size ✓
Academic Challenge Higher-Order Learning 41.7 41.8 .00 ✓ 43.0 -.10 ✓
Reflective and Integrative Learning 33.9 39.9** -.49 41.6*** -.63
Learning Strategies 39.6 40.8 -.08 ✓ 42.6 -.21
Quantitative Reasoning 30.2 31.3 -.07 ✓ 32.7 -.16
Learning with Peers Collaborative Learning 32.8 36.1 -.24 38.6* -.43
Discussions with Diverse Others 36.9 42.0 -.33 43.5 -.43
Experiences with Faculty Student-Faculty Interaction 28.2 29.9 -.11 33.9 -.36
Effective Teaching Practices 36.2 41.8 -.41 43.5 -.54
Campus Environment Quality of Interactions 37.7 45.2** -.63 47.4*** -.80
Supportive Environment 25.6 34.8** -.66 37.0*** -.81
Notes: Results weighted by institution-reported sex and enrollment status (and institution size for comparison groups); Effect size: Mean difference divided by the pooled standard deviation; *p <.05, **p <.01, ***p <.001 (2-tailed).
a. Precision-weighted means (produced by Hierarchical Linear Modeling) were used to determine the top 50% and top 10% institutions for each Engagement Indicator from all NSSE 2018 and 2019 institutions, separately by class. Using this method, Engagement Indicator scores of institutions with relatively large standard errors were adjusted toward the mean of all students, while those with smaller standard errors received smaller corrections. As a result, schools with less stable data—even those with high average scores—may not be among the top scorers. NSSE does not publish the names of the top 50% and top 10% institutions because of our commitment not to release institutional results and our policy against ranking institutions.
b. Check marks are assigned to comparisons that are either significant and positive, or non-significant with an effect size > -10.