Table 4: Percentages of Students Who Withdrew from Developmental and Gateway Courses or Received a Grade Below C (Source: KSU Office of Institutional Research and Effectiveness). [Link to Grades_Dev&Gateway_1.pdf and Grades_Dev&Gateway_2.pdf]

ClassFall 2004Spring 2005Fall 2005Spring 2006Fall 2006Spring 2007Fall 2007
ENG 088NANA3737345749
ENG 089NANA3845406051
ENG 099NANA3032384244
ENG 10142534242464342
ENG 10247353738464644
ENG 10351485735535143
MAT 095NANA4746505361
MAT 097NANA5345435155
MAT 11148454852615453
MAT 11537585948615359
BIO 10143482442394439
CHE 109NANANANANANA40
Total44464542464950

The courses in the list form the essential foundation for academic success at the University; if KSU hopes to improve student learning and retention and graduation rates, student performance in those classes must be addressed.

Data from the National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) and the Noel-Levitz College Student Inventory (CSI) provide useful information suggesting some of the reasons for poor student performance. Table 5 provides results from category 9 ("Time Usage") of NSSE, which indicates students' self-reporting of the number of hours they devote to academic work outside of time spent in class.

14