The ultimate value of the 2019 evaluation of the President of KSU resides in the totality of responses from the Board, and the Presidential self-assessment. Although other constituent groups were not included in this evaluation, their comments and concerns are welcomed once the final evaluation report is ready for public dissemination.

Future Presidential evaluations should utilize more rigor, especially in the development of the evaluation tools. As was stated earlier, it is important for this effort to be a fair and authentic summation of the President's leadership efforts. The Board of Regents deserve a wealth of data and information to facilitate their review and their decision-making.

The survey responses and comments of the Board of Regents combined with their perusal of his self-assessment feedback suggest that high value is placed upon the leadership style and accomplishments of President M. Christopher Brown II.