in pursuing and achieving AACSB accreditation as mandated by the KSU Board of Regents.
In making this recommendation, I have reviewed the promotion application, the supplemental reviews and evaluations as specified in the Checklist for Promotion, and the criteria for promotion as stated in Section 2.6.2.1 of the Faculty Handbook. I have taken into consideration the recommendations of the Unit Committee, Chair, Dean, and University Committee. I also took into consideration the letter of rebuttal from the candidate. Along these lines, the Unit Committee, and Chair approved the promotion to professor with tenure. However, the Dean and the University Committee recommended tenure, but not promotion to full professor. This Office had to dig deeper into all documents, including the rebuttals of the candidate, other documents in the dossier, and the letter and intent of the Faculty Handbook policies.
When Dr. Banerjee was hired, Provost Candace Jackson, at that time, awarded four years toward tenure, and thus four years toward promotion to full professor. Although he has had more than ten years in higher education in three different institutions, only four of those years were granted toward tenure and promotion at Kentucky State University. Dr. Banerjee has been employed by Kentucky State University since 2017. Therefore, four years (granted upon hire) plus the three years he has been here, that seven years toward his ten-year requirement for the rank of professor (2.6.2.1). This was cited by the Dean and she thus recommended tenure and disapproves of promotion to full professor. She suggests that he applies for promotion at the conclusion of the next three years.
The University Tenure and Promotion Committee argued that the four years granted by Dr. Jackson was relative to tenure only and not for promotion. If that is in fact the case a candidate could be granted tenure and promotion to full promotion without ever serving at Kentucky State. That I maintain was not the spirit or letter of the law. The University Tenure and Promotion Committee’s deliberations were split: six in favor of