Alumni Survey
Assessments Measured throughout the EPP Process
Praxis II
Praxis I & Major GPA
Dispositions
CAO- Candidate Assessment & Objectives
Instructional Assessments
PLT
Teacher Work Samples
Literacy Assessment
Graduate Exit Survey
Student Portfolio's
EPP Graduation to Employment:
2015-2016- 11 students graduated, and 8 are listed as employed by EPSB
2016-2017- 11 students graduated, and 3 are listed as employed by EPSB
2017-2018- 19 students graduated, and 8 are listed as employed by EPSB
2018-2019- 6 students graduated, and 3 are listed as employed by EPSB
2019-2020- 8 students graduated, and 8 are listed as employed by EPSB
EPP GPA Data of TEP Completers 2016-2020
(Benchmark >3.0)
2016-2017- 3.47 Admitted/3.56 Grad
2017-2018- 3.65 Admitted/3.70 Grad
2018-2019- 3.30 Admitted/3.50 Grad
2019-2020- 3.48 Admitted/3.76 Grad
Section 5. Areas for Improvement, Weaknesses, and/or Stipulations
Waived
Section 6. Continuous Improvement
Waived
Section 8: Preparer's Authorization
Preparer's authorization. By checking the box below, I indicate that I am authorized by the EPP to complete the 2021 EPP Annual Report.
I am authorized to complete this report.
Report Preparer's Information
Position: Director of Data & Assessment
Phone: 8593128736
E-mail: phillip.clay@kysu.edu
I understand that all the information that is provided to CAEP from EPPs seeking initial accreditation, continuing accreditation or having completed the accreditation process is considered the property of CAEP and may be used for training, research and data review. CAEP reserves the right to compile and issue data derived from accreditation documents.
CAEP Accreditation Policy
Policy V.3.01 Annual Accreditation Report
The Annual Accreditation Report (Annual Report) process, along with CAEP’s review of any complaint against an EPP, is used to monitor and evaluate an EPPs continued compliance with CAEP’s Standards. The Annual Accreditation Report requires, at a minimum:
Information demonstrating that the EPP is correcting or has corrected any conditions leading to the identification of Areas for Improvement and Stipulations from prior accreditation decisions;
Key data and indicators, including but not limited to, fiscal information and measures of candidates' effectiveness and impact on P-12 student learning;
Current headcount enrollment data which will be used to monitor overall growth of the EPP; and
Report substantive changes that may affect an EPP's accreditation status or eligibility.