Any change that means the EPP no longer satisfies accreditation standards or requirements:
3.6 Change in regional accreditation status
3.7 Change in state program approval
Section 4. Display of Annual Reporting Measures.
Annual Reporting Measures (CAEP Component 5.4 | A.5.4)
Impact Measures (CAEP Standard 4)Outcome Measures
1. Impact on P-12 learning and development (Component 4.1)5. Graduation Rates (initial & advanced levels)
2. Indicators of teaching effectiveness (Component 4.2)6. Ability of completers to meet licensing (certification) and any additional state requirements; Title II (initial & advanced levels)
3. Satisfaction of employers and employment milestones (Component 4.3 | A.4.1)7. Ability of completers to be hired in education positions for which they have prepared (initial & advanced levels)
4. Satisfaction of completers (Component 4.4 | A.4.2)8. Student loan default rates and other consumer information (initial & advanced levels)
4.1 Provide a link or links that demonstrate data relevant to each of the Annual Reporting Measures are public-friendly and prominently displayed on the educator preparation provider's website.
Link: https://wd.kyepsb.net/epsb.webapps/admissionsexit/ApprovedPrograms/ApprovedPrgReport.aspx?pOrgId=6544&pRoute=&pType=&pType=&pCat=
Description of data accessible via link: Division of Educator Preparation, Assessment, and Internship Guest access The Division of Educator Preparation, Assessment, and Internship ensures that preparation programs for Kentucky educators meet established standards of quality. It facilitates the accreditation process, reviews programs and continuous assessment materials, and provides technical assistance for program improvement. This division maintains the array of assessments required for teacher and administrator certification. It oversees the Kentucky Teacher Internship Program (KTIP) and the Kentucky Principal Internship Program (KPIP), designed to provide assistance to new teachers and principals.
Tag the Annual Reporting Measure(s) represented in the link above to the appropriate preparation level(s) (initial and/or advanced, as offered by the EPP) and corresponding measure number.
Level \ Annual Reporting Measure1.2.3.4.5.6.7.8.
Initial-Licensure Programs☑☑☑☐☐☐☐☐
Advanced-Level Programs☐☐☐☐☐☐
4.2 Summarize data and trends from the data linked above, reflecting on the prompts below.
What has the provider learned from reviewing its Annual Reporting Measures over the past three years? Discuss any emerging, long-term, expected, or unexpected trends? Discuss any programmatic/provider-wide changes being planned as a result of these data? Are benchmarks available for comparison? Are measures widely shared? How? With whom?
In reviewing the Annual Reporting Measures over the last three years, we noticed similar results. As an EPP we maintain the exit of qualified candidates, yet we learned we need to continue the enhancement of our recruiting and retention efforts. Our programs number and completers decreased, yet this is in step with the national decrease in new teacher candidates. Our EPP program along with other offices on campus such as the Office of Institutional Research, The B.R.E.D.S Office for Enrollment and Scholarship, and Career Services and Professional Development are working tirelessly to recruit and retain more teaching candidates.