COMPREHENSIVE FACULTY EVALUATION SYSTEM ADMINISTRATIVE TABULATION Form L-AT-1

Faculty Member: Date:

Administrator: Division/Unit: Library

The following is a tabulation of the Peer Reviewer Forms, the Administrator's Review Form, and the Self-Evaluation Rating Form. The summative ratings below must be accompanied by signatures of the Faculty member and the Administrator. When forwarded to the Dean, Vice President of Academic Affairs, and the President, a completed Professional Development Plan, Form PDP/DEA-1, for the coming year must accompany this form.

Faculty Reviewers: D COMPETENCE E D PROFESSIONAL E D SERVICE E

M E M E M E E

Peer Reviewer 2: ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Peer Reviewer 3: ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Peer Reviewer 4: ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Peer Reviewer 5: ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Peer Reviewer 6: ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Peer Reviewer 7: ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Peer Reviewer 1: ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐

Tally:

Administrator:

Self-Evaluation:

SUMMARY RATINGS

Exceeds ExpectationsAAAAAAAAAA-AAAAAAA Meets ExpectationsAAAAAAAAAA-AAAAA Does Not Meet Expectations AAA ……

1. With regard to Professional Competence, this faculty member:
2. With regard to Professional and Creative Activity, this faculty member:
3. With regard to Service, this faculty member:

Any summary rating of Does Not Meet Expectations or Exceeds Expectations requires justification. Administrative Tabulation: Rationale for Ratings, Form AT-2 must be attached.

These ratings have been discussed and accepted by:

Signed:

Administrator Faculty Member

Accepted by Vice President for Academic Affairs:

Date:

5-62