COMPREHENSIVE FACULTY EVALUATION SYSTEM

PEER REVIEW FORM

Form PR-1

Peer Reviewer Number: ___

Faculty

Member: _____

Date:

Division/Unit: ___

This review is based on the reviewer's examination of the faculty member's achievements as presented in the curriculum vitae, success with respect to the Professional Development Plan/Distribution of Effort Agreement prepared for the previous year, and observations of teaching (when appropriate). For each of the three evaluated areas below, any rating of "does not meet expectations" or "exceeds expectations" must be accompanied with clear and specific rationale. The reviewer is required to make reference to specific items in the curriculum vitae or in the Professional Development Plan/Distribution of Effort Agreement that support any rating other than "meets expectations."

This review includes a classroom observation: ☐ Yes ☐ No

RATING CATEGORIES

Exceeds ExpectationsÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ Meets ExpectationsÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ Does Not Meet ExpectationsÄ

1. Teaching:

  1. Teaching:
  2. Instruction:
  3. Planning and Preparation:
  4. Advising:
  5. Continuing Growth:
  6. Continuing Growth: ___ Exceeds Expectations
  7. Note: For Categories 2 and 3, a Faculty Member is not expected to have ratings in each sub-category. It is possible and acceptable to receive a rating of “exceeds expectations” in only one sub-category and then also receive an overall rating of “exceeds expectations” for the entire category. Mark only the areas that apply.
  8. Summary for Teaching:
  9. Professional/Creative Activity:
  10. Publication:
  11. Research:
  12. Performance:
  13. Development:
  14. Other (Specified in PDP/DEA-1):
  15. Other (Specified in PDP/DEA-1): ___
  16. . service: Summary for Service:
  17. University: ☐ ☐ ☐ Overall, this faculty member:
  18. Unit: ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Does Not Meet Expectations
  19. Community: ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Meets Expectations
  20. Other (Specified in PDP): ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Exceeds Expectations

Please attach Form PR-2, the Peer Reviewer's Rationale for Ratings, to offer rationale and reference to documentation for any ratings of “Does not meet expectations” or “Exceeds expectations.”

5-52