Distribution of Ratings
Chair's Review
Approximately 10% - Exceeds Expectations in all four areas
29% - Meets Expectations in all four areas
Less than 1% were identified as needing in improvement in all areas
Less than 1% were identified as unsatisfactory in all areas
59% were identified as having ratings across all four areas.
Dean's Review
Less than 3% - Exceeds Expectations in all areas
Less than 3% - Exceeds Expectations in all areas
Less than 10% - were identified as unsatisfactory in all areas - 84% were identified as having ratings across all four areas.
84% were identified as having ratings across all four areas.
* A letter of assessment (from the Chair) was sent to each faculty member as a method of communicating the performance ratings.