Division of Academic Affairs Office of the Provost Hume Hall | 400 East Main Street Frankfort, KY 40601 KYSU.EDU
Click or tap to enter a date.
Click or tap here to enter the faculty assignment type. Click or tap here to enter the college. Click or tap here to enter the school. Click or tap here to enter the academic program.
Re: Faculty Performance Letter of Assessment
Dear Click or tap here to enter the faculty's name.
In compliance with House Bill 250, Section 1(g), effective April 8, 2022, it is my responsibility to evaluate termed faculty performance annually, and to prepare a written performance review, taking into consideration three categories: 1) Evidence of Quality Teaching Effectiveness; 2) Evidence of Quality Professional Growth and Scholarly Achievement; and, 3) Evidence of Quality Service and Community Contribution. In addition to evaluating faculty performance and productivity, the process shall be used to identify deficiencies and ineffectiveness and redirect faculty efforts to improve or increase productivity.
The process shall be used as a basis for decisions on continued employment, promotion, salary increases, tenure, and maintenance of tenure. All evaluations are conducted ethically, with recommendations and justifications based on relevant documented and verifiable information. It is also my responsibility to ensure that the performance standard evaluation recommendations are consistent with the goals and needs of the university and the areas within your scope of responsibility.
Section One: Candidate Narrative Assessment
Click or tap here to enter text regarding your assessment of the faculty's narrative.
Section Two: Curriculum Vitae Assessment
Click or tap here to enter text regarding your assessment of the faculty's curriculum vitae.
Section Three: Evidence of Quality and Effectiveness in Teaching Assessment
Performance Evaluation Rating Categories:
☐Exceeds Expectations (3) ☐Needs Improvement (1)
☐Meets Expectations (2) ☐Unsatisfactory (0)
Click or tap here to enter regarding your assessment of the faculty's evidence of quality and effectiveness in teaching. Based on student evaluations, peer reviews, and/or observations, the following are guiding questions to consider: 1) what strategies were used to support the learning process; 2) what active, authentic, and high-impact learning strategies were used to support authentic learning; 3) articulate how instructional strategies yielded high levels of