college- and university-level administrators. The documented evidence shall be a part of the individual's evaluation dossier.
Criteria
Faculty shall be evaluated on their teaching, research, and service performance for the 2022 calendar year using established discipline guidelines. This HB 250 mandate stipulates a performance review process that will include all tenured, tenure-track, and term faculty. For faculty members who do not submit a performance review, do not develop and obtain an approved performance improvement plan according to the obtained performance rating described below, or fails to implement a performance plan, the provost could recommend sanctions up to dismissal for the faculty member.
In reviewing all three areas of faculty performance (quality of teaching effectiveness, quality of professional development and scholarly achievement, and quality of service and community contribution), faculty appointments that are reassigned to the administration, library, research or extension will be evaluated according to their annual contracts and distribution of effort agreements. Faculty may include scholarly achievements from Fall 2020 to Fall 2022 in the professional growth and scholarly achievement category only.
Academic discipline areas may articulate expectations beyond the minimum to meet professional accrediting and/or certification criteria.
8