Page 25 of 45

to execute any and all documents necessary for the acquisition of a portion of Block 6502, Lot 23, which is the subject matter of this ordinance.

SECTION 4. All ordinances or parts of ordinances inconsistent herewith are hereby repealed.

SECTION 5. This ordinance shall take effect after second reading and publication as required by law, and the satisfaction of the requirements of N.J.S.A. 40:69A-1, et seq.

SECTION 6. That a certified copy of this ordinance be forwarded to the

Township Attorney.

MAYOR MICHAEL REINA

NOTICE

NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the foregoing ordinance was introduced and passed on first reading at a regular meeting of the Township Council of the Township of Jackson, in the County of Ocean, State of New Jersey, held on April 13, 2010, and will be considered for second reading and final passage at the regular meeting of said Governing Body to be held on the 27th day of April, 2010, at 7:30 p.m., or as soon thereafter as this matter can be reached, at the meeting room of the Municipal Building located at 95 W. Veterans Highway, Jackson, New Jersey, at which time all persons interested shall be given an opportunity to be heard concerning this ordinance.

ANN MARIE EDEN, RMC

Township Clerk, Township of Jackson

SCHEDULE A

All that certain lot, piece or parcel of land, with the buildings and improvements thereon erected, situate, lying and being in the Township of Jackson, County of Ocean and State of New Jersey:

Being known and designated as Lots 14 and 15 in Block Y on a map entitled “Arcadia Gardens Section One, Jackson Township, Ocean County, New Jersey” duly filed in the Ocean County Clerk’s Office on December 11, 1926 as Map C-230.

Formerly known as Lots 16 and 23, Block 121.07, now known as Lots 22 and 23, Block 6502 on the Township of Jackson Tax Map.

DATED: 4/13/10

ANN MARIE EDEN, RMC TOWNSHIP CLERK

PUBLIC HEARING OPENED, RESOLUTIONS ONLY

PAUL MAYEROWITZ – 91 CYPRESS POINTE LANE mentioned 159R-10 and asked why this is only a six-month contract. Attorney Gilmore goes on to explain that they can only award this type of contract for as long as the Mayor’s present term. Also regarding 168R-10 why do we need to buy 16 stalker radar units? Administrator Del Turco responded that their current technology is from 1970 technology and we’re trying to standardize them. He goes on to describe the capabilities of the new radar. Mr. Mayerowitz stated that he did not believe the Citizens Budgetary Advisory Board was in support of this and he also stated that we’re operating under an emergency budget how can we afford this. Administrator Del Turco stated that this is being funded from a