PAYM ENT OF VOUCHER (2): September 2, 2026 $175 Motion to Approve / Heiman Second/ Tremer Vote and Yes Vote: Heiman, Tremer, Cusano, Silecchia, Hofstein, Bradley Approved

ANNOUNCEMENTS: Ms. Tumolo announced the township, in an effort that our digital community remains inclusive and accessible to everyone in order to better serve all residents, the Township has officially partnered with ReciteMe to ensure that online pdf documents are fully ADA compliant and accessible to individuals with diverse visual and cognitive needs, the program format doesn't always translate correctly. It seems to be a format and spacing issue, with the way the document is put in. There is an option to click to view the original pdf.

Board Professionals in Attendance and sworn in by Board Attorney M atthew Wildler, Bd Engineer Ernest Peters, Bd Planner (absent) Gina Tumolo, Zoning Officer Brian Intindola, Traffic Engineer (absent)

Discussion: None

Applications:

APPLICANT: LANE M ORELL (VARIANCE 3562) BLOCK: 11801 LOT: 60 ZONE: R-3 LOCATION: 90 LEESVILLE ROAD APPLICANT IS SEEKING A VARIANCE TO CONSTRUCT A DETACHED GARAGE 30' X 50' X 15' IN HEIGHT, AT 21.68' SIDE SETBACK WHERE50' M INIM UM IS REQUIRED AND AT 43' REAR SETBACK WHERE 100' IS REQUIRED ON THIS UNDERSIZED LOT .97 ACRE IN THE R-3 ZONE

Lane M orell, duly sworn by Bd Attorney, applicant representing himself. M r. M orell is looking to replace a building that was existing but collapsed during a snowstorm. The building was 26.2x42 shed, and he is looking to put up a pole barn, standard size is 30x50. This would extend the building 4ft to the right and 8 ft toward the rear, from where the existing building was. This would be strictly for storage. M s. Bradley asked if he is planning on putting electricity. The applicant testified there was electricity to the original building and he would like to continue to have electric in the proposed building, the existing conduit is still there. He would have a licensed electrician come out and connect it again. M r. Wilder said there is an existing shed, it is not reflected on the survey and it requires variance relief. M r. Wilder spoke to the applicant before the hearing and reviewed with the applicant where it is located. M r. Wilder said the side yard setback to existing shed is 30ft and rear setback is 10ft. The applicant will provide a revised survey that includes the shed. M r. Wilder said he will require variance relief for the side and rear setbacks. M r Heiman asked size of shed. Applicant stated it is 12x20. M r. Wilder added the property predates the zoning modification with respect to the grandfathering of the R1 zone. The problem with the grandfathering of the R1 zone is it requires properties to be 1 acre. This property is .97 acres and it misses that 1 acre threshold by 3%. Because of this the R3 zoning standards apply. M r. Wilder added if the R1 standards were applied, some of the variants would be eliminated and the ones that are still required would be diminimus. M r. M orell said the pole barn will be used for tractor storage, car that was bought to restore. No hazardous materials. The existing shed will have shovels and lawnmower in it. The existing shed does not have utilities. The applicant does not have any