Per §244-94C(6) the maximum building height permitted is 35 ft, whereas 36 ft is proposed to the roof. The Applicant has requested a variance.

Per §244-94C(6) the maximum building height permitted is 35 ft, whereas 50 ft is proposed to the bulkhead. Per §244-156B the height limitations created hereunder shall not apply to spires, belfries, cupolas, or domes not used for human occupancy or to parapets, walls or cornices extending not more than four feet above the building height limit. Per §244-156C the height limitations created hereunder shall apply to chimneys, ventilators, skylights, stair towers, elevator towers, appurtenances usually carried above the roof level and noncommercial radio and television antennas attached to a building, except that same may exceed said height limitation by not more than 15 feet, except that skylights, heating and air-conditioning equipment and ventilators may exceed the height limitation by no more than six feet. Such features shall not exceed, in total coverage, 20% of the total roof area. A variance may be required.

Per §244-94C(7)(b) the required parking setback to a residential use is 20 ft, whereas 10.2 ft is provided along the southerly property line. The Applicant has requested a variance.

Per §244-197N(1) the minimum number of parking spaces required is 75 parking spaces. The Applicant proposes 63 parking spaces + 7 EV parking spaces as indicated in the parking calculations but have not been depicted on the plans. Once the EV ready spaces are shown and labeled on the plan, a total of 70 spaces will be provided, whereas 75 parking spaces are required. The Applicant has requested a variance.

Per §244-207B(7) each principal building may have one wall sign not to exceed 15% of the principal façade area or 80 sf, whichever is smaller, whereas 2 wall signs are proposed.

The Applicant is proposing to construct a 14,979 sf, 3-story office building. The summary statement of operations indicates “The information provided within this summary statement of operations serves as a general guideline only and is not intended to limit the flexibility of the proposed use or business”. Testimony shall be provided to discuss this statement and the possible changes to the summary statement of operations anticipated.

The Applicant shall provide testimony to discuss the proposed operations in sufficient detail to indicate the effects of the use in producing traffic congestion, noise, glare, air pollution, fire hazards or safety hazard, the hours of operation of the use, the number of shifts to be worked, the number of employees in each shift, the number of vehicles to be stored or parked on the site and provisions to be made for site maintenance.

The Applicant has obtained an Inconsistent Certificate of Filing from the Pinelands Commission. As indicated in the Inconsistent Certificate of Filing, no permit or approval shall take effect and no development may occur until the Commission issues a letter indicating that the municipal or county permit or approval may take effect. The Applicant shall provide testimony to discuss whether the inconsistencies listed on page 3 of 3 of the Inconsistent Certificate of Filing dated June 2, 2025 have been addressed.