Minimum Side Yard Setback (244-46): 60 FT Required; 50.48 FT Provided New Lot 24.03
Minimum Lot Depth (244-46): 400 FT Required; 314.07: Provided New Lot 34.01
Should the Board act favorably on the subdivision request, the applicant should address the following in consideration of site plan design:
| Required | Proposed Lot | Proposed Lot | Proposed Lot |
|---|
| | 24.03 | 24.04 | 24.05 |
|---|
| Minimum Lot Area | 215,000 SF | 136,061 SF* | 112,582 SF* | 109,824 SF* |
|---|
| Minimum Lot Width | 200 FT | 233.37 FT | 204.98 FT | 249.89 FT |
|---|
| Min. Lot Frontage - Pfister Rd | 100 FT | 236.20 FT | 181.12 FT | 265.23 FT |
|---|
| Min. Lot Frontage - Farmingdale Rd | 100 FT | 628.90 FT | N/A | N/A |
|---|
| Minimum Lot Depth | 400 FT | 600.15 FT | 540.79 FT | 513.48 FT |
|---|
| Min. Front Yard Setback - Farmingdale Rd | 80 FT | 80.50 FT | N/A | N/A |
|---|
| Min. Front Yard Setback - Pfister Rd | 80 FT | 159.05 FT | 102.73 FT | 111.72 FT |
|---|
| Minimum Rear Yard Setback | 50 FT | 304.36 FT | 298.72 FT | 303.38 FT |
|---|
| Minimum Side Yard Setback | 60 FT | 50.48 FT | 62.00 FT | 60.72 FT |
|---|
| Maximum Building Coverage | 10% | 7.00% | 9.77% | 9.28% |
|---|
| Maximum Building Height | 35 FT | ≤35 FT | ≤35 FT | ≤35 FT |
|---|
Engineer Review and Development Proposal- As noted above, the site plan development is consistent with the prior Board approval associated with 3 private schools with the exception of the 3 individual lots to be created and the cross access easements will be required.
The applicant should confirm that all prior representation associated with the prior approval will be met.
Utilities- The drawings indicate that sewer service will be provided by a private on-site septic systems and individual wells. A fire suppression well and 40,000-gallon cistern are also proposed, consistent with the prior approval. Any approval which may be granted would be conditioned upon approval from the Jackson Township Municipal Utility Authority and applicable regulatory agencies.
The applicant should confirm all Bureau of Fire Safety comments associated with the amended application will be addressed.
Environmental Considerations
Individual wells and septic systems are not typically provided with school development. The applicant should address ground water impact concerns associated with the proposed septic systems and individual well(s) which are proposed. Specifically:
Anticipated wastewater flows
Proposals for potable water service including irrigation. What is the anticipated pumping capacity of the proposed well(s) and will they continuously supply the fire protection cistern?