Mr. Bressi did vote on this at the Council and he voted no. He definitely understands the way to vote goes tonight. You are voting for consistent or not consistent. Mr. Peters described it perfectly. Mr. Bressi had some problems with the ordinance and he still does. In all purposes, the ordinance written as it stands now by the wisdom of the Master Plan Subcommittee and what they put together by leaving these different entities out is it is not a permitted use. That is where we are now. When you read the ordinance in section 2A, it states that a data center shall not be listed as a permitted or conditional use in any zoning district within the Township of Jackson. That brings us right back to where we are now. The problem he has is contradicting the Master Plan with an ordinance. We are protected by the Municipal Land Use Law on this where it is not a permitted use, they have to go in front of the Zoning Board. With the ordinance, they still get to go in front of the Zoning Board. They may have to say a little more to prove their case, but that is the only difference. They still have to go in front of the Zoning Board for a D1 variance. In his opinion, although that part matches the consistency, the ordinance does not because it puts buffers and speed bumps in where it helps the applicants and the attorneys to fight this. When you are in the right and you try to add too much right, you can hurt yourself. And that is what this does. The ordinance really attacks the credibility of the Master Plan and the people that put it together because it says clearly it is not a permitted use and the Master Plan Subcommittee and this Planning Board voted on that and the Council voted on it. So it was established that it is not a permitted use and the MLUL states it is not a permitted use. Now you see many cases where lawyers and applicants fight the ordinances. You do not see many cases where they fight the Municipal Land Use Law. If anything is on interpretation currently, they are not allowed in any zone at all. They are not permitted. One simple way to put it, if they go to the Zoning Board and they appeal it, they can appeal it and appeal the ordinance. Mr. Bressi stated that the Township Attorney told him that by pointing out a particular use to be banned by affirmative legislation, it permits a developer of the same to argue the Township itself and therefore the Zoning Board is also biased against their application. What that means when Mr. Bressi talked to the Township Attorney is couple of things. One, the Township Council appoints the Zoning Board. So now you are saying it is prohibited by the Council. You are telling the people you are appointing, the Zoning Board, they cannot vote for it. It is taking away the freedoms of the Zoning Board to do their job to hear the D1 variance clearly in their minds. That is why Mr. Bressi thinks this can help big applicants, big money applicants, big attorneys to turn stuff around to appeal something and take it to one judge to feel the way they feel. And in the ordinance, if you go through the whole thing, it takes you back to square one, exactly where we are today. They are not permitting any data center in any zone in the Township. You have that already, not protected by ordinance, but protected by the Municipal Land Use Law. And out of all the attorneys Mr. Bressi spoke to, they all said the ordinance cannot stop them from going to the Zoning Board. They are still entitled to that. It is still a D1 variance. They may have to put a little more emphasis on what they have to present as a good thing to have and all that. Good luck with them doing that with a data center. That is the only change. Other than that, you are contradicting the Master Plan because it is not a permitted use. When you do conditional uses, the applicant will find ways to meet a conditional use. So now when you have an ordinance like this, they have ways they can challenge the ordinance on its own in 45 days. Once it is adopted, they can challenge it anywhere when their application comes in. They can challenge the ordinance along with the decision of a Zoning Board. It gives them that many more bites of the apple and he really feels that it hurts the credibility of the Master Plan and that is basically why he voted no. Mr. Bressi read the last sentence of Mr. Peters' summary which states "We do not believe that