structures in the affordable housing area: there is no change proposed to this. Original plan had 8 sheds, 1 for each building so affordable housing can store bikes and other various things. Item 7: Questioned Denton Lane which intersects with Whitesville, the development will connect with Denton and it will be improved by a subdivision at the corner called Denton Pines. Which is separate but will have the obligation to improve the intersection. This application is relying on the Denton Pines Project. Mr. Peters pointed out that this applicant needs to reassure the board that when they get to the point in development with Denton Lane that they will do the necessary improvements and not rely on the Denton Pines Project. Mr. Borden stated he can show those plans as supplementary to this application. Mr. Borden agreed he can satisfy what Mr. Peters is asking. Item 8: asked for letters of consent from the 3 property owners, the board secretary has been provided them. Lot 8 on Whitlock is not part of the project. Item 1 of traffic circulation notes: Mullen St was not included in the street vacation request, as per Mr. Borden this was an oversight and will be included. Trees: The site is not subject to Tree Ordinance, there is a tree settlement agreement which will guide the removal of trees. Mr. Borden will provide copy of that to the Board. Recreation will be Phase 1 with no change. They are requesting a temporary office trailer. Mr. Borden summarized that the amended project includes reduction by 11 lots, to comply with Pinelands Wetlands Statutes and Pinelands Storm water Management requirements. Ms. Cipriani asked to go over the affordable housing: Phase 1 70 and 8, 62 and 16 affordable, 60 and 16 affordable, this is only 40 affordable. Mr. Borden agreed they are only proposing to build 40 in these phases. Applicants lawyer clarified that the site plan calls for a total of 48 affordable and the additional 8 will be built with the later 2 phases, the site plan will remain the same. Ms. Cipriani will look at that existing proposal and may have some questions at a later date. Mr. Peters stated the lot dimensions are not on the plan, they are not approving the lot layout, they are asking for preliminary and final, when they put the lot dimensions on it if there is a problem they will have to come back before the board. Mr. Peters wants clarified signal and access points and what county improvements are being done. Mr. Borden all three existing intersections are all lighted county intersections, they are proposing Veterans and S Hope to be signalized and including left turn lanes, the County has approved the project including the striping and improvements to the two intersections and they have also reviewed and approved the house of worship. Ms. Bradley open to the public for questions to Mr. Borden. Paul Revere duly sworn by Bd Attorney. Mr. Revere asked if Pinelands approved the wetlands, Mr. Borden stated they have approved and accepted. Mr. Revere where will the children play and home owners association building? Mr. Borden: there is a designated play area approximately ¼ acre in size and there will be no home owners building. Mr. Revere feels not having a building for functions and to gather is a problem. No further questions by public.

Application will be carried to June 18, 2025 with no additional notice required.

Motion to adjourn Ms. Bradley/Second Mr. Heiman Agreed by all.

Meeting adjourned at 10:51pm.

Respectfully submitted by, Kathleen Bibza Zoning Board Recording Secretary