.

Lane which leads to Whitesville Rd. All intersections will have a traffic signal. The traffic will not use current road Whitlock, they will accomplish this by having a cul-de-sac, and so existing residents will not have an increase in thru traffic. Secondary component of the project are the affordable units, located on the NW corner of property which already has a D3 conditional use variance approved. The RG-2 has a 20% affordable housing component and this is being met. Standard is maximum 4 unit buildings, applicant obtained the D3 variance for 8 unit buildings, this area is completely unchanged. Proposing 48 affordable units, where only 38 are required. Phase 1-3 are in progress but there is a phase 4 and 5 they have not been in front of any land use board yet. So the additional 10 units are to service future projects. Ms. Bradley asked about original approval including 48 affordable units and will that be in Phase 1-3? Mr. Borden answered yes, they understand they have to follow the 20% which is a conditional standard. There is a recreation area close to E Vets Hgwy and there is improvements for what used to be Maple Lake Campground and a building which will be incorporated into the recreation area. He confirmed the recreational components will be completed in Phase 1. The last improvement is a lot adjacent to S Hope Chapel Rd this has a separate plan approval for a house of worship. The lot will be created by the subdivision. They are not proposing to change that. The lot will be developed by this project during Phase 1 and then it will be sold to whoever intends on building the house of worship. All improvements having to do with this lot will be created during Phase 1. Mr. Peters made statement to the board the subdivision and affordable housing don't rely on the house of worship, but the house of worship site plan relies upon the improvements that need to be installed as part of the phasing plans for residential portion of the site, including sewer, water and storm water management. Mr. Borden agreed, the house of worship isn't standalone it requires subdivision application for its infrastructure. The changes that were forced by Pinelands, down near Denton Lane, there is small additional wetland expansion it was not deemed as wetlands when they got the Certificate of filing with wetlands verified. When they applied for a final review they deemed additional wetlands. The result is relocating access road to E Vets slightly to the east. Amended subdivision proposes 194 lots, they lost 11 lots that is 192 to be built and 2 house to remain. Pinelands introduced another item in their Certificate of filing, they want Mr. Borden to testify that this is not a high hazard forest area. In Pinelands when more than 100 homes being built you must provide a 200ft buffer to any adjoining forest that is high hazard. Mr. Borden stated for the record there is no unbroken forest surrounding the property, completely surrounded by development on all sides. The trees that can be seen on Cannon Blvd actually have houses on the property and around Canon and the areas that are not developed are fresh water wetland which are not high hazard. There is no high hazard forest anywhere surrounding this project. All of the lots/bulk zone requirements are met. Mr. Borden addressed questions raised by planner's letter: The area 8.28 which is near cul-de-sac of Whitlock and the new road Mahogany, the lot appears to have frontage on two roads, is there 80 ft. on any road...Mr. Borden yes there is the portion of Mahogany that is near Whitlock is 50ft but they are not proposing to access that and they would deed restrict access from 8.22 and 8.28 to prevent them access to Whitlock. The separation between cul-de-sac and Mahogany is very narrow they are proposing hedge and tree landscaping to aid as a buffer between. Mr. Peters asked about the Whitlock Ave right away does it end before it gets to Mahogany. The answer the right always will connect, the existing Whitlock right away overlaps onto Mahogany, and they have a street vacation request into the township council to vacate a few streets including the portion of Whitlock that is currently overlapping Mahogany. Mr. Peters expressed concern about the cul-de-sac and right away from Mahogany, concern is they will have to deal with board engineer and tax assessor to make sure they don't create another lot east of Mahogany or a no man's land. Mr. Borden agreed. Mr. Borden addressing the open space, 3 lakes and wetlands to the south, on approved plan is 65 acres and now due to the wetland it opens the space to 70 acres. The question in the planners review letter, the lot/third lake, it is land locked from the residential lots, and the lot space does not comply with zone requirements. Mr. Peters said it is his job to make this board's decision appeal proof, if he needs a variance he thinks they can prove hardship for the variance but that little piece of land doesn't serve a purpose it doesn't have frontage on improved street so it doesn't comply with RG-2 zone requirements. Mr. Borden stated the lot would require a lot frontage variance, it meets all the other requirements, it is a lake and there are walking trails that remain unchanged. They would ask for the D3 variance for the lot. Affordable housing parking remains unchanged, 96 spaces provided and they were not asked to provide guest parking, they are not proposing to change this. 15% of lot will be EV ready. Mr. Borden said they agree to comply with all the comments in the Bd Planners letter, including Morgan Engineering comments. HOA will maintain storm water management systems. This project was caught in between the change storm water management rules, they were approved prior to the adoption of the Green Infrastructure Rules. Pinelands has determined they must comply with them. Original plan had 3 very large storm water basins, and now they are proposing 31 basins. To meet the requirement to provide smaller discreet basins. Some of basins are on home ownen lots and easements will be provided and all will be maintained by homeowners association. Item 6 questioned