Page 4 of 35

ELENOR HANNUM- RESIDENT- Asked why it is settling with other LLC's that were not a part of the Jackson Trails project to begin with.

SARAH FROINT- RESIDENT- Feels hatred. Enjoys living in this Township. Thanked the Mayor for all that he has done.

RICHARD CIUILO -215 GRANT AVENUE SEASIDE HTS - Wanted to know why this case is being settled.

Council President Flemming reiterated again that this matter is still in litigation.

JOSEPH SULLIVAN- 31 CATHY COURT- Opposed the settlement due to Environmental reasons.

ERIC HANNUM-RESIDENT- Asked if there are any constraints to the Deeds of who can and can't own these units?

THOMAS BRADLEY-4 WEST VIRGINIA ROAD – Commended the Council on their vigilance and what they have done. He believes that this matter would open up the Township for a future lawsuit with violating the First Amendment.

ROGER DERICKSON- 10 LAURELTON AVENUE – Asked are there any more potential lawsuits in the future?

JENNIFER CUSANELLI - 14 BLUE SPRUCE DRIVE – Addressed Council and asked if they are you still going to settle?

ATTORNEY POHLMAN-Provided the following response to the public's comments:

• Everyone is treated the same under the law and the Governing Body is obligated to obey by those laws.
• With regards to the location of the House of Worship Mr. Pohlman stated that if it was moved to a different location it could not be done with in the RG 3 zone and be in compliance.
• With regards to Community laws, Mr. Pohlman stated that there is no HOA, however, the Community laws will obey by local ordinances and follow local code.
• With Regards to those LLC's, they do own property and they have to settle with those claims.
• Attorney Pohlman reviewed the record and there was no acknowledgement during the hearing for the use of the House of Worship and it does comply with the RG 3 zones.
• Regarding the restricted covenants the answer is no, the use is still Governed by our ordinances and zones. The individual property homeowner's will have privacy screens, fences and will have to maintain their property.
• Regarding the settlement, it does not violate the establishment clause.
• With regards to this particular lawsuit it will not bring up another lawsuit.

ATTORNEY MCGUCKIN informed the residents that the Fair Housing Act does applies. The House of Worship does not require a variance to the zone, Public law does apply within that development.

MOTION TO CLOSE PUBLIC COMMENT, RESOLUTIONS ONLY BY: SAUICKIE MOTION SECONDED BY: KERN YES: BORRELLI, CHISHOLM, SAUICKIE, KERN, FLEMMING

RESOLUTION 132R-22