These Scope Details define the level of service and the processes involved, and describe the characteristics of the deliverables the consultant will produce while engaging in the tasks and Elements of Work listed in the Scope Outline above.
Scope items to be determined and defined separately, not included in this fee: Baggage Claim area modifications
Schematic Design Documents – Schematic Design will be based on the approved layout/concept from the previous phase of work (Conceptual Programming & Layout). The objective will be to provide design studies and prepare presentation materials for each major component of the building development and to further establish the overall scope of the project by refining the program requirements to allow for preliminary budget confirmation by the Construction Manager for SRO approval. This phase will begin with the BIM model setup, development, and coordination between disciplines.
MEP&FP Systems (TLC):
Schematic Design shall provide evaluation of one CEP/Electrical Service option to support MEP & FP work for all project components [Ground Boarding Facility; Future Concourse A (to SD level)];
Concourse B de-clutter and expansion (Bump-outs) and Main Terminal Expansion elements] to include the following:
Preliminary load calculations
Identify scope of work based on existing conditions survey for review and pricing.
Concourse B de-clutter: MEP/FP system expansion to support bump outs; 7500 sf, and maintain existing infrastructure for the remainder of the concourse, with a review for specific item replacement; i.e. lighting, power for modified concessions, downstream of AHU HVAC modifications, and miscellaneous plumbing and FP for ceiling modifications. Major MEP/FP infrastructure within the Concourse to remain for existing areas.
MEP & FP Systems Design Narrative
Service size verifications and coordination with Utility companies and Civil.
Existing Terminal Building Automation Trending, Electrical Usage Trending.
Existing conditions survey and recommendations for replacement of equipment.
Central Energy Plant and Main Electrical Service Design Option Review – perform a 15% level review of concepts that will include site, capacity, efficiency, cost, and payback:
Option 1 – upgrade the existing CEP and Electrical by expanding the existing location at the Hub.
Option 2 – provide a design narrative with LCCA for a new CEP and Electrical service location sized to serve the GBF, with N+1 redundancy.
Life Cycle Cost Analysis for multiple options – Provide an LCCA to compare Options for decision making of MEP+FP system design and modifications. In order to prepare this analysis, building electrical power usage for cooling and
Page | 33