MOTION: Commissioner Spencer moved approval of Agenda Items 8F, 8G, 8H, 8I, 8J, 8K, 8L, 8M, 8N, 8O, and 8P as presented and authorize staff to prepare any and all documents as recommended. Commissioner Beruff seconded. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (6-0)

Commissioner Beruff left the meeting at this time (1:16 p.m.)

Item 6. Approval: RFQ-01-2021-CAE, Professional Architectural & Engineering Services for Design of Commercial Apron Expansion Project.

Mr. Piccolo advised staff received Request for Qualifications for a qualified firm capable of providing professional engineering and architectural design, permitting, bidding, and construction phase services to construct an expansion to the existing commercial apron. Staff reviewed the submitted responses and selected three proposing firms to make presentations today at which time the Board will rank the firms.

Mr. Bailey explained the general protocol for presenters and the voting process that would take place following the presentations. Under CCNA, no clear law exists, therefore, competing firms have the right to remain in the room while competitors are presenting. He advised that the tradition at the airport is for the firms chosen to present, leave the room during the other presentations, but it is not required.

Each firm made presentations in alphabetical order: AECOM; American Infrastructure Development, Inc. (AID) and EG Solutions. The Board selected the first, second, and third choice firm, with Mr. Bailey conducting the ballot voting process.

The ballot vote for first choice resulted in five votes for EG Solutions, no votes for AECOM or AID. The ballot vote for second choice resulted in three votes for AECOM, and two votes for AID. The Board ranked the firms as follows:

Contract negotiations will begin with the first ranked firm of EG Solutions and a contract will be brought back to the Board if successful.

MOTION: Commissioner Jackson moved approval of the selected firms of EG Solutions as first ranked firm; AECOM as second ranked firm; and American Infrastructure Development, Inc. as third ranked firm; and for staff to negotiate scope and fees with the first ranked firm and if successful to present contract for approval at the next Board meeting and prepare all documents necessary to implement this action. Commissioner Biter seconded. MOTION PASSED UNANIMOUSLY (5-0)

Mr. Piccolo advised staff received Request for Qualifications for a qualified firm capable of providing professional engineering and architectural design, permitting, bidding, and construction phase services to expand and upgrade existing Concourse B, and provide design for