{
    "document_id": 16843,
    "page": 76,
    "width_pt": 612,
    "height_pt": 792,
    "rotation": 0,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 16958,
    "item_count": 6,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "footer": 1,
        "heading": 2,
        "text": 3
    },
    "build_ms": 1,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p76.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 69.6,
                "t": 696.48,
                "r": 212.4,
                "b": 683.04
            },
            "text": "6.2 Public Involvement",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p76.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.64,
                "t": 667.44,
                "r": 542.64,
                "b": 585.6
            },
            "text": "A Public Involvement Plan (PIP) was developed and approved in June 2023 and updated in June 2026. The PIP was implemented in compliance with Part 1, Chapter 11 of the FDOT Project Development and Environment Manual (PD&E Manual); Florida Statute 339.155; Executive Orders 11990 and 11988; Council on Environmental Quality Regulations for Implementing the Procedural Provisions of the NEPA and 23 CFR 771."
        },
        {
            "id": "p76.3",
            "order": 3,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.64,
                "t": 574.8,
                "r": 543.12,
                "b": 443.28
            },
            "text": "FDOT utilized the PIP to obtain input and involvement from the public, key stakeholder groups, and others who could be affected by, benefit from, and/or have an interest in the proposed project. Most of the public involvement resources have been directed toward communicating with people who live, work, or have an interest in the Bradenton-Palmetto Connector PD&E Study. One of the primary goals was to provide affected communities with clear, consistent, accurate, and current information about the project throughout the NEPA process, including the alternatives being examined. The Comments and Coordination Report will document the outreach activities the FDOT has conducted and the comments submitted."
        },
        {
            "id": "p76.4",
            "order": 4,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 69.6,
                "t": 432.72,
                "r": 200.64,
                "b": 419.04
            },
            "text": "6.3 Public Workshop",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p76.5",
            "order": 5,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.4,
                "t": 403.44,
                "r": 543.36,
                "b": 102.48
            },
            "text": "A Public Workshop was held on February 3, 2026, and a virtual meeting was held on February 5, 2026. At the in-person meeting, attendees could leave written comments. All other comments were submitted either by email, website, or by mail. During the in-person meeting, 23 comments were received. Three comments were received during the 10-day comment period following the meeting, which ended on February 16, 2026. Most commenters expressed support for Corridor A, favoring the \"Ultimate\" elevated concept, and eliminating Corridors B and D. The comments emphasized operations and safety needs, better management of aggressive drivers merging near the hospital, and safer access to businesses. Several comments urged that any Ultimate elevated solution be four lanes at build-out to ensure long-term capacity and reliability. Multimodal improvements were emphasized, including dedicated and separated pedestrian and bike facilities. Environmental protection was a concern in the public comments, especially the potential effects on wetlands, floodplains, and habitats north of the river. Some comments included questions about stormwater, flood risk, and the role of the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers in review. Several comments emphasized the need for coordinated signal timing during construction, stronger speed management and enforcement on neighborhood streets, and clearer traveler information to reduce congestion due to crashes. Finally, stakeholders highlighted the importance and the need for securing state and federal funding to deliver the preferred alternative and other related connectivity improvements projects in the area."
        },
        {
            "id": "p76.6",
            "order": 6,
            "type": "footer",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 494.64,
                "t": 74.4,
                "r": 541.2,
                "b": 60.24
            },
            "text": "Page | 66",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "number"
            }
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": []
    }
}