{
    "document_id": 16783,
    "page": 40,
    "width_pt": 612,
    "height_pt": 792,
    "rotation": 0,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 16894,
    "item_count": 5,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "text": 5
    },
    "build_ms": 1,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p40.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.88,
                "t": 715.44,
                "r": 543.36,
                "b": 657.84
            },
            "text": "When a conflict of interest exists, Kentucky State University’s Ethical Principles provides that “removal from further participation in such matters is required” when there is “full disclosure of any real or perceived conflict with personal interests,” in conducting or participating in any transaction.” p. 4."
        },
        {
            "id": "p40.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.88,
                "t": 647.52,
                "r": 543.6,
                "b": 549.36
            },
            "text": "While KSU’s Board of Regents has not formulated a recusal procedure, it would be reasonable to interpret this statement to mean that the board member with the perceived or actual conflict of interest must remove or recuse himself or herself from conducting or participating in a transaction for which a question has been raised. Should the board member refuse to remove or recuse himself or herself, it would be reasonable to interpret this statement to mean that the full board is required to remove or recuse that board member from conducting or participating in the transaction."
        },
        {
            "id": "p40.3",
            "order": 3,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.64,
                "t": 537.84,
                "r": 543.36,
                "b": 399.84
            },
            "text": "Given the analysis above, Robert’s Rules of Order (RONR) would not apply in this situation because KSU has a special rule relating to conflict of interest and recusal. The term “recusal” is not a term used in RONR nor is it generally a term associated with parliamentary procedure. “Recusal” is a legal term. However, RONR does provide that no member can be compelled to refrain from voting simply because a perceived “conflict of interest” with respect to the motion under consideration. If a member has a direct personal or pecuniary (monetary) interest in a motion under consideration not common to other members, the rule in RONR is that he should not vote on such a motion, but even then he or she cannot be compelled to refrain from voting. See RONR (11th ed.), p. 407, ll. 21-31."
        },
        {
            "id": "p40.4",
            "order": 4,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 69.12,
                "t": 387.84,
                "r": 543.36,
                "b": 344.88
            },
            "text": "It is important to note that RONR are default rules and govern only if there are no contrary provisions in any federal, state, or other law applicable to KSU, or in KSU's bylaws, or in any special rules KSU has adopted."
        },
        {
            "id": "p40.5",
            "order": 5,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 289.44,
                "t": 63.12,
                "r": 322.8,
                "b": 50.4
            },
            "text": "8 of 8",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "number"
            }
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": []
    }
}