{ "document_id": 16776, "page": 220, "width_pt": 612, "height_pt": 792, "rotation": 0, "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48", "engine": "paddleocr_vl", "source_run_id": 16897, "item_count": 16, "counts_by_type": { "footer": 1, "header": 1, "text": 14 }, "build_ms": 2, "items": [ { "id": "p220.1", "order": 1, "type": "header", "bbox": { "l": 533.04, "t": 755.04, "r": 541.2, "b": 744.72 }, "text": "9", "attrs": { "block_label": "number" }, "level": 2 }, { "id": "p220.2", "order": 2, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.56, "t": 719.76, "r": 529.2, "b": 681.12 }, "text": "Flores, D.M., Richardson, J.T., & Merlino, M.L. (2010). Examining the effects of the Daubert trilogy on expert evidence practices in federal civil court: An empirical analysis. Southern Illinois Law Journal, 34, 533-564.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.3", "order": 3, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 69.6, "t": 668.16, "r": 515.76, "b": 641.52 }, "text": "Merlino, M.L., & Springer, V. (2009). Context and controversy: Why questions of validity and reliability are seldom resolved in an adversarial setting. Tulsa Law Review, 45, 133-145.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.4", "order": 4, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 69.84, "t": 629.52, "r": 538.56, "b": 602.88 }, "text": "Domitrovich, S., & Merlino, M.L. (2009). Neuroscience and the Law: Cutting edge issues for twenty-first century judges as gatekeepers. The Judge's Journal (48), 19-22.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.5", "order": 5, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 68.64, "t": 590.4, "r": 537.6, "b": 552.48 }, "text": "Merlino, M.L., Richardson, J.T., Chamberlain, J., & Springer, V. (2008). Science in the law school curriculum: A snapshot of the legal education landscape. Journal of Legal Education, 58, 190-213.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.6", "order": 6, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 68.88, "t": 539.04, "r": 540.96, "b": 499.92 }, "text": "Merlino, M.L., Springer, V., Kelly, J.S., Hammond, D., Sahota, E., & Haines, L. (2008). Meeting the challenges of the Daubert trilogy: Refining and redefining the reliability of forensic evidence. Tulsa Law Review, 43(2), 417-445.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.7", "order": 7, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 69.84, "t": 487.44, "r": 548.16, "b": 461.04 }, "text": "Merlino, M.L., Murray, C.I., & Richardson, J.T. (2008). Judicial gatekeeping and the social construction of the admissibility of expert testimony. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 26(2), 187-206.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.8", "order": 8, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.32, "t": 448.8, "r": 556.32, "b": 410.4 }, "text": "Dobbin, S.A., Gatowski, S.I., Eyre, R.N., Dahir, V.B., Merlino, M.L., & Richardson, J.T. (2007). Federal and state trial judges on the proffer and presentation of expert evidence. Justice System Journal, 28(1), 1-15.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.9", "order": 9, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.08, "t": 397.2, "r": 557.52, "b": 358.08 }, "text": "Dahir, V.B., Richardson, J.T., Ginsburg, G.P., Gatowski, S.I., Dobbin, S.A., & Merlino, M.L. (2005). Judicial application of Daubert to psychological syndrome and profile evidence: A research note. Psychology, Public Policy, & Law, 11(1), 62-82.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.10", "order": 10, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.08, "t": 345.6, "r": 538.08, "b": 319.2 }, "text": "Richardson, J.T., Ginsburg, G.P., Dobbin, S.A., Gatowski, S.I., Dahir, V.B., & Merlino, M. (2003). Judges and epidemiological evidence. Judicature, 87(1), 38-39.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.11", "order": 11, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.08, "t": 306.96, "r": 522.72, "b": 280.56 }, "text": "Merlino, M.L., Dillehay, R.C., Dahir, V., & Maxwell, D. (2003). Science education for judges: What, where, and by whom? Judicature, 86(4), 210-213.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.12", "order": 12, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.32, "t": 268.08, "r": 503.28, "b": 229.2 }, "text": "Dobbin, S.A., Gatowski, S.I., Richardson, J.T., Ginsburg, G.P., Merlino, M.L., & Dahir, V. (2002). Applying Daubert: How well do judges understand science and scientific method? Judicature, 85(5), 244-247.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.13", "order": 13, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.32, "t": 216.72, "r": 530.64, "b": 176.64 }, "text": "Dobbin, S.A., Gatowski, S.I., Ginsburg, G.P., Merlino, M.L., Dahir, V., & Richardson, J.T. (2001). Surveying difficult populations: Lessons learned from a national survey of state trial court judges. Justice System Journal, 22(3), 287-307.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.14", "order": 14, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.32, "t": 164.64, "r": 539.76, "b": 126.48 }, "text": "Gatowski, S.I., Dobbin, S.A., Richardson, J.T., Ginsburg, G.P., Merlino, M.L., & Dahir, V. (2001). Asking the gatekeepers: A national survey of judges on judging expert evidence in a post-Daubert world. Law and Human Behavior, 25(5), 433-458.", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.15", "order": 15, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 70.08, "t": 113.04, "r": 529.2, "b": 87.36 }, "text": "Davis, D., Follette, W.C., & Merlino, M.L. (1999). Seeds of rape: Female behavior is probative for females, definitive for males. Psychological Expertise and Criminal Justice: A Conference for", "attrs": { "block_label": "reference_content" } }, { "id": "p220.16", "order": 16, "type": "footer", "bbox": { "l": 258.48, "t": 47.52, "r": 352.56, "b": 37.2 }, "text": "Page 255 of 532", "attrs": { "block_label": "footer" } } ], "excluded_furniture": { "first": [], "last": [] } }