{ "document_id": 16713, "page": 75, "width_pt": 792, "height_pt": 612, "rotation": 0, "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48", "engine": "paddleocr_vl", "source_run_id": 16839, "item_count": 18, "counts_by_type": { "footer": 1, "table": 1, "table_cell": 16 }, "build_ms": 4, "items": [ { "id": "p75.1", "order": 1, "type": "table", "bbox": { "l": 72.72, "t": 540, "r": 722.64, "b": 79.68 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "block_label": "table", "n_rows": 4, "n_cols": 4, "integrity": { "cells_checked": 11, "cells_flagged": 0 } }, "children": [ { "id": "p75.1.1", "order": 2, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 72.72, "t": 540, "r": 235.2, "b": 424.92 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "row": 0, "col": 0, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "column_header": true, "header_source": "pdf" } }, { "id": "p75.1.2", "order": 3, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 235.2, "t": 540, "r": 397.68, "b": 424.92 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "row": 0, "col": 1, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "column_header": true, "header_source": "pdf" } }, { "id": "p75.1.3", "order": 4, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 397.68, "t": 540, "r": 560.16, "b": 424.92 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "row": 0, "col": 2, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "column_header": true, "header_source": "pdf" } }, { "id": "p75.1.4", "order": 5, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 567.83, "t": 536.40468, "r": 708.984221, "b": 513.08368 }, "text": "administered and considered in this metric area.", "attrs": { "row": 0, "col": 3, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true, "column_header": true, "header_source": "pdf" } }, { "id": "p75.1.5", "order": 6, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 78.23088, "t": 509.04467999999997, "r": 181.667591, "b": 364.76548 }, "text": "Why would student written comments not be used as part of the faculty members evaluation and only for self-development? As long as they are properly considered, they can give some helpful context that scores cannot provide.", "attrs": { "row": 1, "col": 0, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true } }, { "id": "p75.1.6", "order": 7, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 195.111, "t": 509.04467999999997, "r": 310.779234, "b": 458.84448 }, "text": "We will now take into consideration student comments as well as total scores in our new policy.", "attrs": { "row": 1, "col": 1, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true } }, { "id": "p75.1.7", "order": 8, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 323.991, "t": 509.04467999999997, "r": 513.508508, "b": 485.72408 }, "text": "Chairperson read all evaluations, including comments.", "attrs": { "row": 1, "col": 2, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true } }, { "id": "p75.1.8", "order": 9, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 567.82997, "t": 509.04467999999997, "r": 707.316086, "b": 431.96488 }, "text": "Faculty will address formally all student comments in the negative as a part of their narrative for self-evaluation in their annual performance review dossier.", "attrs": { "row": 1, "col": 3, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true } }, { "id": "p75.1.9", "order": 10, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 78.2309, "t": 360.72468000000003, "r": 179.959879, "b": 270.44448 }, "text": "For tabulation of scores, it states that the faculty member and the unit administrator will agree on the ratings to be given.", "attrs": { "row": 2, "col": 0, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true } }, { "id": "p75.1.10", "order": 11, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 195.111, "t": 360.72468000000003, "r": 311.625641, "b": 270.44488 }, "text": "Why would the faculty member evaluated be given input here? We will no longer be using these forms and will be using a tool derived from the EKU assessment form.", "attrs": { "row": 2, "col": 1, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true } }, { "id": "p75.1.11", "order": 12, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 397.68, "t": 309.84, "r": 560.16, "b": 194.76 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "row": 2, "col": 2, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1 } }, { "id": "p75.1.12", "order": 13, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 567.83, "t": 360.72468000000003, "r": 713.752558, "b": 283.88428 }, "text": "Faculty will be required to sign off as to having received a copy of the evaluations provided and have the opportunity to provide rebuttals/appeal documentation per new policy 2.xx.", "attrs": { "row": 2, "col": 3, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true } }, { "id": "p75.1.13", "order": 14, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 78.23085, "t": 252.96468, "r": 182.61966, "b": 81.80628000000002 }, "text": "Failure to meet expectations in one or more area should trigger more than a monitoring plan toward remedy. Failure at some level should trigger a determination on removal and if the decision is not to remove, the rationale should be put forward", "attrs": { "row": 3, "col": 0, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true } }, { "id": "p75.1.14", "order": 15, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 195.11088, "t": 252.96468, "r": 312.397355, "b": 149.00448 }, "text": "The new evaluation plan includes peer, Chair, Dean, and Provost review. During this process, recommendations could lead to the Provost notifying the President of faculty non-reappointment recommendations.", "attrs": { "row": 3, "col": 1, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true } }, { "id": "p75.1.15", "order": 16, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 397.68, "t": 194.76, "r": 560.16, "b": 79.68 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "row": 3, "col": 2, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1 } }, { "id": "p75.1.16", "order": 17, "type": "table_cell", "bbox": { "l": 567.82998, "t": 252.96468, "r": 713.033888, "b": 175.88488 }, "text": "Failure to perform at the minimum default University Faculty Expectations metrics will trigger non-reappointment consideration recommendations.", "attrs": { "row": 3, "col": 3, "rowspan": 1, "colspan": 1, "bbox_refit": true } } ] }, { "id": "p75.2", "order": 18, "type": "footer", "bbox": { "l": 360.72, "t": 36.96, "r": 430.8, "b": 28.56 }, "text": "Page 75 of 358", "attrs": { "block_label": "number" } } ], "excluded_furniture": { "first": [], "last": [] } }