{
    "document_id": 16696,
    "page": 7,
    "width_pt": 595.32,
    "height_pt": 841.92,
    "rotation": 0,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 16807,
    "item_count": 16,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "heading": 4,
        "list": 1,
        "list_item": 3,
        "text": 8
    },
    "build_ms": 3,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p7.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 98.8601,
                "t": 768.96,
                "r": 541.5708,
                "b": 745.2
            },
            "text": "there are other cases where PBSA promoters have sought to challenge LPA pipeline and the criteria that they applied."
        },
        {
            "id": "p7.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 51.1097,
                "t": 738.96,
                "r": 543.2505,
                "b": 714.72
            },
            "text": "2.6. Following our assessment, we have categorised each of the sites via traffic light system according to the site's current status as a defendable part of the city's pipeline for addressing PBSA need."
        },
        {
            "id": "p7.3",
            "order": 3,
            "type": "list",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 98.8601,
                "t": 709.0064,
                "r": 537.0118,
                "b": 584.88
            },
            "text": "",
            "attrs": {
                "item_count": 3
            },
            "children": [
                {
                    "id": "p7.3.1",
                    "order": 4,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 99.1,
                        "t": 709.0064,
                        "r": 527.1737,
                        "b": 684.48
                    },
                    "text": "Sites categorised as green will have planning permission, and, as far as we are aware, are intended to come forward.",
                    "marker": "-"
                },
                {
                    "id": "p7.3.2",
                    "order": 5,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 98.8601,
                        "t": 678.0408,
                        "r": 537.0118,
                        "b": 615.6
                    },
                    "text": "Sites in amber are those that are capable of meeting demand in the period to 2030, but where further action is required in order that they can be established as a fully defendable part of the pipeline. In addition, to qualify as amber, there must be a realistic prospect of those actions being achieved. Site in amber include those that have been submitted for planning but have not yet received planning permission."
                },
                {
                    "id": "p7.3.3",
                    "order": 6,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 99.34,
                        "t": 610.4721,
                        "r": 535.3321,
                        "b": 584.88
                    },
                    "text": "Sites identified as red would be those that we believe either cannot realistically come forward for PBSA in the period to 2030."
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "id": "p7.4",
            "order": 7,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 50.8697,
                "t": 579.12,
                "r": 540.611,
                "b": 506.4
            },
            "text": "2.7. All sites identified as either amber or green are considered to form part of Manchester City Council's pipeline of potential PBSA sites. 'Pipeline' therefore can be defined as covering sites at all stages of the planning and development process. This includes sites at the pre-planning stage which have been identified within Manchester's Strategic Regeneration Frameworks, or where pre-application discussions have already taken place with the Local Planning Authority. It also includes sites that are subject to current planning applications, those sites with planning permission secured and those schemes that are under construction."
        },
        {
            "id": "p7.5",
            "order": 8,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 51.8296,
                "t": 499.44,
                "r": 186.2025,
                "b": 485.04
            },
            "text": "2 (b) University Workshops",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p7.6",
            "order": 9,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 50.6298,
                "t": 479.28,
                "r": 538.2115,
                "b": 406.08
            },
            "text": "2.8. Separate workshop meetings with the Estates teams at University of Manchester and Manchester Metropolitan University have taken place in October 2022. The purpose of these meetings has been to understand their views on the nature of demand (now and in the future) and their current or emerging strategies for meeting that demand. In addition, we have gathered evidence on the planned contribution of their estates to meeting that quantitative and qualitative demand and explored whether there are opportunities to collaborate and expedite delivery where appropriate."
        },
        {
            "id": "p7.7",
            "order": 10,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 51.8296,
                "t": 399.36,
                "r": 169.8858,
                "b": 385.2
            },
            "text": "2 (c) Recommendations",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p7.8",
            "order": 11,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 50.8697,
                "t": 379.2,
                "r": 543.2505,
                "b": 282.72
            },
            "text": "2.9. Having concluded Step 2A and 2B, high level recommendations are made on the relevant actions that could be explored further to increase certainty and maximise delivery. This has considered, for example: any opportunities for MCC and the universities to utilise their land assets to unlock sites or expedite delivery; potential for partnership arrangements with private sector PBSA suppliers; the use of planning obligations where required to unlock sites e.g. infrastructure delivery; and, changes that might be required to planning policy (taking into account the forthcoming Development Plan review) to mitigate risks and ensure qualitative outcomes as well as quantitative outcomes are achieved (for example, tacking issues of affordability)."
        },
        {
            "id": "p7.9",
            "order": 12,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 51.8296,
                "t": 275.28,
                "r": 128.1342,
                "b": 261.84
            },
            "text": "3 PBSA Policies",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p7.10",
            "order": 13,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 50.6298,
                "t": 254.88,
                "r": 534.1323,
                "b": 206.16
            },
            "text": "2.10. A review of PBSA policies in London and selected other major university cities has been undertaken. The purpose of this exercise has been to understand whether this presents any opportunities for the LPA to adapt or strengthen Policy H12 via the forthcoming Development Plan review, in order to ensure that PBSA development take place in line with need but in the right locations."
        },
        {
            "id": "p7.11",
            "order": 14,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 51.8296,
                "t": 198.96,
                "r": 194.3608,
                "b": 186
            },
            "text": "Limitations and Assumptions",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p7.12",
            "order": 15,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 50.8697,
                "t": 179.52,
                "r": 541.5708,
                "b": 106.8
            },
            "text": "2.11. The analysis of each site has been carried out using publicly available information and market intelligence, whilst applying professional judgement. As with any dataset and associated analysis, these may be subject to subject to change over time, which may influence the findings of the assessment and could lead to the assessment suffering from time lag. Based on the availability of information and variation in the level of feasibility work undertaken on each site there are also limitations with regards to the presentation of directly comparable information."
        },
        {
            "id": "p7.13",
            "order": 16,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 51.3496,
                "t": 100.08,
                "r": 329.6935,
                "b": 88.08
            },
            "text": "2.12. The assumptions and limitations are summarised below:"
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": []
    }
}