{
    "document_id": 16696,
    "page": 12,
    "width_pt": 595.32,
    "height_pt": 841.92,
    "rotation": 0,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 16807,
    "item_count": 7,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "heading": 1,
        "list_item": 1,
        "text": 5
    },
    "build_ms": 3,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p12.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 51.1097,
                "t": 769.2,
                "r": 540.3711,
                "b": 707.76
            },
            "text": "3.12. The policy proposals for Policy H12 for consultation are set out within the Committee Report. Reference is made to the aim of Policy H12 in ensuring that the right mix of student housing is delivered, in the right parts of the city, to meet the demands of the evolving student population and the wider growth and regeneration objectives of MCC and its partners. The key policy ideas that the Council sought to consult on in 2019/20 are summarised below:"
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "list_item",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 117.5763,
                "t": 702.7713,
                "r": 542.2907,
                "b": 677.28
            },
            "text": "Supporting regeneration objectives – the starting point for all student residential schemes should be that they contribute to delivering the regeneration objectives for the city."
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.3",
            "order": 3,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 51.1097,
                "t": 670.56,
                "r": 542.2907,
                "b": 228.72
            },
            "text": "Oxford Road Corridor - the approach needs to be within the context of the approved Corridor\nSpatial Framework which establishes the principle that development of land in the Oxford Road\nCorridor should prioritise commercial or educational/research use, and so student accommodation\nshould, therefore, be in the right locations, in appropriate numbers, and only where it supports\nwider growth.\nAffordability – Manchester is considered one of the most expensive cities in the UK for PBSA. A more diverse pipeline of PBSA is therefore required to stabilise rental growth. There is also the need to ensure that the market meets the needs of students at an affordable price. Reference is made to the London policy of 35% affordable units within any new PBSA to be encouraged.\n- Quality - the overall quality of Manchester's PBSA stock is poor compared to other cities, with the current poor quality accommodation needing to be addressed. All PBSA must be of a high quality, providing a high standard of living, within close proximity to the city's higher education institutions. Design should allow sufficient facilities to cater for the overall wellbeing of students.\nWell-being, safety, and security – PBSA should consider the welfare and wellbeing of students as a major factor, in both design and management. Ensuring that student accommodation is delivered in safe and secure locations, and with appropriate management and facilities.\n- Density - density of student accommodation will be essential to deliver the level of new high-quality accommodation needed within the context of scarce land availability both in the Oxford Road Corridor area and the wider city centre.\nLocation - should be located in the areas immediately adjacent to the core university areas, principally the Oxford Road Corridor area. This may include parts of surrounding neighbourhoods such as Hulme and Ardwick which are immediately adjacent to the university campuses.\n- Sustainability - given the current climate emergency and Manchester's commitment to be carbon neutral by 2038, it is increasingly important that the location of student accommodation in Manchester should continue to be driven by proximity to university campuses, reducing the need to travel, and to sustainable modes of transport.\nMix of uses – the need to maintain the right balance of commercial, educational, residential, cultural and leisure use. A limited amount of PBSA will be considered, in appropriate locations, where it can be demonstrated that it will support commercial and educational use, and the overall growth and regeneration objectives for the Corridor and the city.\n3.13. The 2019 report recommended the undertaking of the consultation process with key stakeholders with the outcomes to be reported back to the Executive."
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.4",
            "order": 4,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 52.5494,
                "t": 222,
                "r": 126.4545,
                "b": 210
            },
            "text": "December 2020",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.5",
            "order": 5,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 52.0695,
                "t": 202.8,
                "r": 541.0909,
                "b": 153.84
            },
            "text": "3.14. In December 2020, the Council’s Executive Committee received a report on PBSA in Manchester. The 2020 report informs the Executive of the outcome of the consultation exercise with key stakeholders on PBSA. The report also sought the Executive’s approval to use the outcomes to inform a policy approach to PBSA in Manchester, with a view of developing a policy position as part of the Local plan review process."
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.6",
            "order": 6,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 51.8296,
                "t": 147.84,
                "r": 514.6963,
                "b": 123.6
            },
            "text": "3.15. The key stakeholders engaged with included property developers, students, and higher education establishments as part of Phase 1, and subsequently Manchester residents and businesses for Phase 2."
        },
        {
            "id": "p12.7",
            "order": 7,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 51.3496,
                "t": 117.6,
                "r": 531.9728,
                "b": 93.12
            },
            "text": "3.16. Phase 1 consultation took place in early 2020 (ending March 2020), with Phase 2 having followed (ending May 2020). A number of challenges were raised, which are summarised in the December report, including:"
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": []
    }
}