{ "document_id": 16532, "page": 51, "width_pt": 612, "height_pt": 792, "rotation": 0, "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48", "engine": "paddleocr_vl", "source_run_id": 16643, "item_count": 13, "counts_by_type": { "footer": 1, "header": 1, "heading": 2, "list": 1, "list_item": 7, "text": 1 }, "build_ms": 2, "items": [ { "id": "p51.1", "order": 1, "type": "header", "bbox": { "l": 215.76, "t": 763.44, "r": 396, "b": 717.6 }, "text": "KENTUCKY STATE UNIVERSITY\nNOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS\n(Continued)\nJune 30, 2021", "attrs": { "block_label": "header" }, "level": 2 }, { "id": "p51.2", "order": 2, "type": "heading", "bbox": { "l": 69.6, "t": 693.36, "r": 454.8, "b": 679.92 }, "text": "NOTE 10 - OTHER POSTEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS PLANS (OPEB) (CONTINUED)", "attrs": { "block_label": "paragraph_title" }, "level": 3 }, { "id": "p51.3", "order": 3, "type": "text", "bbox": { "l": 69.6, "t": 669.6, "r": 536.16, "b": 622.08 }, "text": "Mortality Table projected with Scale BB to 2013 (set back 4 years for males) is used for the period after disability retirement. There is some margin in the current mortality tables for possible future improvement in mortality rates and that margin will be reviewed again when the next experience investigation is conducted." }, { "id": "p51.4", "order": 4, "type": "heading", "bbox": { "l": 69.84, "t": 612, "r": 193.92, "b": 599.76 }, "text": "Discount rate assumptions:", "level": 3 }, { "id": "p51.5", "order": 5, "type": "list", "bbox": { "l": 69.36, "t": 589.2, "r": 542.4, "b": 197.04 }, "text": "", "attrs": { "item_count": 7 }, "children": [ { "id": "p51.5.1", "order": 6, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 69.84, "t": 589.2, "r": 538.8, "b": 541.92 }, "text": "Discount Rate: The discount rate used to measure the total Non-hazardous OPEB liability was 5.43%, which was reduced from the 5.73% discount rate used in the prior year. The discount rate used to measure the total Hazardous OPEB liability was 5.28%, which was decreased from the 5.66% discount rate used in the prior year.", "marker": "(a)" }, { "id": "p51.5.2", "order": 7, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 69.6, "t": 531.84, "r": 541.68, "b": 483.84 }, "text": "Projected Cash Flows: The projection of cash flows used to determine the discount rate assumed the local employers and plan members would contribute the actuarially determined contribution rate of projected compensation over the remaining 24-year closed amortization period of the unfunded actuarial accrued liability.", "marker": "(b)" }, { "id": "p51.5.3", "order": 8, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 69.36, "t": 474.24, "r": 542.4, "b": 392.16 }, "text": "Long-Term Rate of Return: The long-term expected return on plan assets is reviewed as part of the regular experience studies prepared every five years for the System. The most recent analysis, performed for the period covering fiscal years 2008 through 2013 is outlined in a report dated April 30, 2014. However, the Board of KRS has the authority to review the assumptions on a more frequent basis and adopt new assumptions prior to the next scheduled experience study. The long-term expected rate of return was determined by using a building-block method in which best-estimate ranges of expected future real rate of returns are developed for each asset class.", "marker": "(c)" }, { "id": "p51.5.4", "order": 9, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 69.84, "t": 382.08, "r": 541.44, "b": 358.08 }, "text": "The ranges are combined by weighting the expected future real rate of return by the target asset allocation percentage.", "marker": "(d)" }, { "id": "p51.5.5", "order": 10, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 69.6, "t": 347.76, "r": 541.2, "b": 323.28 }, "text": "Municipal Bond Rate: The discount rate determination used a municipal bond rate of 2.45% as reported in Fidelity Index's “20 – Year Municipal GO AA Index” as of June 30, 2020.", "marker": "(e)" }, { "id": "p51.5.6", "order": 11, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 69.36, "t": 313.2, "r": 542.4, "b": 231.12 }, "text": "Period of Projected Benefit Payments: Current assets, future contributions, and investment earnings are projected to be sufficient to pay the projected benefit payments from the retirement system. However, the cost associated with the implicit employer subsidy is not currently being included in the calculation of the system's actuarial determined contributions, and it is the actuary's understanding that any cost associated with the implicit subsidy will not be paid out of the system's trust. Therefore, the municipal bond rate was applied to future expected benefit payments associated with the implicit subsidy.", "marker": "(f)" }, { "id": "p51.5.7", "order": 12, "type": "list_item", "bbox": { "l": 69.84, "t": 221.28, "r": 530.64, "b": 197.04 }, "text": "Assumed Asset Allocations: The target asset allocation and best estimates of arithmetic real rates of return for each major asset class are summarized in the following table:", "marker": "(g)" } ] }, { "id": "p51.6", "order": 13, "type": "footer", "bbox": { "l": 524.88, "t": 47.04, "r": 539.04, "b": 36.48 }, "text": "48.", "attrs": { "block_label": "number" } } ], "excluded_furniture": { "first": [], "last": [] } }