{
    "document_id": 16423,
    "page": 26,
    "width_pt": 612,
    "height_pt": 792,
    "rotation": 0,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 16535,
    "item_count": 11,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "footer": 1,
        "heading": 4,
        "text": 6
    },
    "build_ms": 1,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p26.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 69.84,
                "t": 719.52,
                "r": 195.12,
                "b": 705.12
            },
            "text": "Deception in Research",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p26.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.4,
                "t": 691.92,
                "r": 542.88,
                "b": 594
            },
            "text": "As a rule, deception of subjects is not considered ethical in human subject research, especially in relation to the principle of informed consent. In certain circumstances, the IRB may approve the use of deception when it is deemed absolutely necessary for the study and does not put the subjects at inappropriate risk. In such instances, researchers may be asked to debrief subjects upon completion of their participation, and this debriefing should disclose the deception used and why the use of deception was necessary."
        },
        {
            "id": "p26.3",
            "order": 3,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 69.6,
                "t": 581.28,
                "r": 228.48,
                "b": 567.36
            },
            "text": "Financial Conflicts of Interest",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p26.4",
            "order": 4,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.16,
                "t": 553.68,
                "r": 541.92,
                "b": 455.76
            },
            "text": "Financial conflict of interest in research is the existence of a significant financial interest on the part of researchers that an independent observer might reasonably determine could affect or compromise, or appears to affect or compromise, the design, conduct, reporting, or management of research. Financial conflicts of interest have the potential to skew or influence the collection, analysis, and interpretation of data, the hiring of staff, the procurement of materials, the sharing of results, the choice of protocol, the involvement or consenting of human participants, or the use of statistical methods."
        },
        {
            "id": "p26.5",
            "order": 5,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 67.92,
                "t": 443.52,
                "r": 542.64,
                "b": 359.28
            },
            "text": "The IRB must be concerned about potential for biased judgment or other abuse when IRB members and researchers have a financial obligation or interest that may pose a conflict of interest which competes with the obligation to protect the rights and welfare of human subjects. In cases where there may be a potential financial conflict of interest, the IRB will refer to KSU's policies regarding conflicts of interest. The IRB may request additional information and revisions of protocols to address conflicts of interest."
        },
        {
            "id": "p26.6",
            "order": 6,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.64,
                "t": 347.28,
                "r": 270.96,
                "b": 333.6
            },
            "text": "VIII. INITIAL FULL BOARD REVIEW",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p26.7",
            "order": 7,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.16,
                "t": 319.44,
                "r": 542.88,
                "b": 276.72
            },
            "text": "The IRB will review research protocols requiring full Board review at convened meetings at which a majority of the members of the IRB are present, including at least one member whose primary concern is in a nonscientific area."
        },
        {
            "id": "p26.8",
            "order": 8,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 70.08,
                "t": 264.24,
                "r": 160.08,
                "b": 249.84
            },
            "text": "8.1 Procedures",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p26.9",
            "order": 9,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.16,
                "t": 236.4,
                "r": 542.64,
                "b": 165.6
            },
            "text": "Researchers seeking a full Board review of a project will submit an application package to the OSP at least one month before a scheduled meeting. In turn, OSP staff will conduct a preliminary screening of the application package, and once the screening has been completed and any issues with the screening have been addressed, OSP staff will provide the application package to the IRB at least one week before the meeting."
        },
        {
            "id": "p26.10",
            "order": 10,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 68.4,
                "t": 153.84,
                "r": 542.64,
                "b": 83.76
            },
            "text": "A primary/secondary reviewer system will be used for new applications reviewed by the convened IRB. However, all IRB members will review all information on the agenda in advance of the meeting (including those protocols for which the IRB member is not the primary reviewer) to be familiar with the protocol, to be prepared to discuss the protocol at the meeting, and to be prepared to determine whether the research meets the"
        },
        {
            "id": "p26.11",
            "order": 11,
            "type": "footer",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 526.32,
                "t": 72.48,
                "r": 541.2,
                "b": 61.68
            },
            "text": "26",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "number"
            }
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": []
    }
}