{
    "document_id": 16410,
    "page": 168,
    "width_pt": 612,
    "height_pt": 792,
    "rotation": 0,
    "pipeline_version": "paddleocr-vl-1.6+paul-48",
    "engine": "paddleocr_vl",
    "source_run_id": 16524,
    "item_count": 10,
    "counts_by_type": {
        "footer": 2,
        "heading": 1,
        "list": 1,
        "list_item": 5,
        "text": 1
    },
    "build_ms": 2,
    "items": [
        {
            "id": "p168.1",
            "order": 1,
            "type": "text",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 100.08,
                "t": 741.84,
                "r": 550.56,
                "b": 560.16
            },
            "text": "faculty member as \"meets expectations\" or \"exceeds expectations.\" If the respondent judges that the faculty member has not reached the benchmarks laid out in the Form PDP/DEA-1 and has not achieved what is normally expected of a unit peer, the respondent must mark the faculty member as \"does not meet expectations.\" If the respondent judges, on the basis of the unit benchmarks, that either the benchmarks listed in the faculty member's Form PDP/DEA-1 or the faculty member's achievements documented in the curriculum vitae are beyond what is normally expected of a unit peer, the respondent must mark the faculty member as \"exceeds expectations.\" In cases where the faculty either fails to meet standards or exceeds expectations set forth in the Professional Development Plan (Form PDP/DEA-1), the peer reviewer must offer a rationale for the evaluation and identify documentation (or lack thereof). Peer review forms are placed in the Portfolio and identified by a reviewer number (Peer Reviewer #1, etc.). The Peer Review Ratings shall be recorded and submitted on Form PR-1 and Form PR-2."
        },
        {
            "id": "p168.2",
            "order": 2,
            "type": "list",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 100.32,
                "t": 548.4,
                "r": 548.4,
                "b": 146.88
            },
            "text": "",
            "attrs": {
                "item_count": 5
            },
            "children": [
                {
                    "id": "p168.2.1",
                    "order": 3,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 101.04,
                        "t": 548.4,
                        "r": 545.76,
                        "b": 506.4
                    },
                    "text": "Peer evaluation instruments, designed by individual units, shall be used by faculty members to evaluate their colleagues. (See the Appendix for Peer Reviewer Form PR-1 and Form PR-2).",
                    "marker": "a."
                },
                {
                    "id": "p168.2.2",
                    "order": 4,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 100.32,
                        "t": 493.44,
                        "r": 548.16,
                        "b": 394.8
                    },
                    "text": "All persons with faculty rank at Kentucky State University shall be evaluated by their peers regarding all aspects of their duties and responsibilities at the University. Faculty must have three to five faculty members on their Peer Review panels. The Peer Reviewer Assignments must include a sufficient number of Area Peers to meet the applicable minimum number of reviewers and at least one Division or Unit Peer. The Peer Reviewer Assignments are recorded on Form AS-1. The unit administrator and the faculty member agree on the selection of Peer Reviewers.",
                    "marker": "b."
                },
                {
                    "id": "p168.2.3",
                    "order": 5,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 100.56,
                        "t": 382.8,
                        "r": 548.4,
                        "b": 312.24
                    },
                    "text": "Faculty members with tenure will undergo a Comprehensive Peer Review every five years; those without tenure will undergo a Comprehensive Peer Review every two years. Adjunct professors who are re-hired regularly by the University are to undergo Comprehensive Peer Review in the semester that they are re-hired after having completed twelve credit hours of teaching at the University.",
                    "marker": "c."
                },
                {
                    "id": "p168.2.4",
                    "order": 6,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 101.04,
                        "t": 300.48,
                        "r": 534,
                        "b": 258.24
                    },
                    "text": "Peer reviews shall be conducted by April 30 of each academic year. All Peer Review Forms will be due in the unit administrator's office no later than April 30 of each academic year.",
                    "marker": "d."
                },
                {
                    "id": "p168.2.5",
                    "order": 7,
                    "type": "list_item",
                    "bbox": {
                        "l": 100.56,
                        "t": 244.56,
                        "r": 546.96,
                        "b": 146.88
                    },
                    "text": "Every faculty member being evaluated shall receive a copy of the Peer Review Form (Form PR-1), the Peer Reviewer's Rationale for Ratings Form (Form PR-2), and the Administrator Review Form (Form AR-1). These forms are to be placed in the faculty member's file. After the conference with the Administrator, the finalized and signed copies of the Professional Development Plan Summary (Form PDP/DEA-1) and the Administrative Tabulation (Form AT-1 and Form AT-2) must be placed in the file. The Peer Reviewer Number Assignments shall remain confidential.",
                    "marker": "e."
                }
            ]
        },
        {
            "id": "p168.3",
            "order": 8,
            "type": "heading",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 83.04,
                "t": 134.64,
                "r": 209.28,
                "b": 120.48
            },
            "text": "5. Classroom Visitation.",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "paragraph_title"
            },
            "level": 3
        },
        {
            "id": "p168.4",
            "order": 9,
            "type": "footer",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 295.92,
                "t": 79.92,
                "r": 321.36,
                "b": 68.16
            },
            "text": "5-34",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "number"
            }
        },
        {
            "id": "p168.5",
            "order": 10,
            "type": "footer",
            "bbox": {
                "l": 258.72,
                "t": 47.76,
                "r": 352.8,
                "b": 36.96
            },
            "text": "Page 321 of 723",
            "attrs": {
                "block_label": "number"
            }
        }
    ],
    "excluded_furniture": {
        "first": [],
        "last": []
    }
}